1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)90206-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross talk and diaphony in neutron detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crosstalk events are more probable for detectors that are close together because of the large solid angle available to the scattered neutron from the neighboring detectors. Since the cross-talk contribution is not necessarily negligible [27,28], some care must be taken to identify it and subtract it from the data.…”
Section: The Neutron Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crosstalk events are more probable for detectors that are close together because of the large solid angle available to the scattered neutron from the neighboring detectors. Since the cross-talk contribution is not necessarily negligible [27,28], some care must be taken to identify it and subtract it from the data.…”
Section: The Neutron Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy pursued in this work has been to reproduce the detection system adopted in the experiment through the development of a simulation code that allows to assess the effect of all the experimental biases on the angular correlations between the neutrons. The simulation performed is based on GEANT4 [7], MENATE_R [8,9] to describe the neutron interaction in the DEMON detectors and ROOT [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cross-talk measurements are the first ever made below 14 MeV [10]. The results were compared to simulations using the codes MENATE [11] and MENATE R [12], a revised version of MENATE for the GEANT4 framework, including only the active scintillator volumes. Simulations give efficiencies in good agreement with the experimental data, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Efficiency and Cross-talk Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%