2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossfostering in mice selectively bred for high and low levels of open‐field thigmotaxis

Abstract: The main purpose of this research was to investigate whether the difference in open-field (OF) thigmotaxis between mice selectively bred for high and low levels of wall-seeking behavior originated from genetic or acquired sources. Unfostered, infostered, and crossfostered mice were compared in two experiments in which the effects of strain, sex, and fostering on ambulation, defecation, exploration, grooming, latency to move, radial latency, rearing, thigmotaxis, and urination were studied. These experiments re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, as the exposure to the OF increased, the field became less frightening to the mouse, thereby decreasing Belzung, 1995). In a previous crossfostering study (Leppänen & Ewalds-Kvist, 2005), the strains did not differ in defecation in a 2-min OF test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…That is, as the exposure to the OF increased, the field became less frightening to the mouse, thereby decreasing Belzung, 1995). In a previous crossfostering study (Leppänen & Ewalds-Kvist, 2005), the strains did not differ in defecation in a 2-min OF test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…They may be measured manually, by video recording or by automated sampling making use of photo beams. The size of open field arenas used to study behavior of mice may reach 90 cm  90 cm, although most arenas range from 30 cm  30 cm to 60 cm  60 cm (Gill and Boyle, 2005;Henderson et al, 2004;Kafkafi et al, 2005;Leppanen and Ewalds-Kvist, 2005;Nagy and McKay, 1972;Singer et al, 2005;Trullas and Skolnick, 1993). In a smaller open field arena the measurement of locomotor activity is more reliable, because emotional factors influencing locomotor activity are supposed to be reduced.…”
Section: The Test System Motility Boxmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The open field test screening efficacy, anxiety-related, and locomotor effects of neurobiological manipulations by using clear cage and record the change that happened on mice in the cage like urination, cleaning coat, movement of animal. [12, 13,14]…”
Section: Open Field Areamentioning
confidence: 99%