1995
DOI: 10.4294/jpe1952.43.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal Transect across the Lofoten Volcanic Passive Continental Margin, N. Norway, Obtained by Use of Ocean Bottom Seismographs, and Implications for Its Evolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10), and the lower crustal variation around the lower crustal reflector beneath the Bivrost lineament is also interpreted to indicate an increase in the volume of the intrusions. This southwestward increase of intrusions along the northern Norwegian margin is believed to be in accord with a southwestward increase in the influence of the Iceland hot spot (KODAIRA et al, 1996). It should be noted that the transition from the ''pure continental'' lower crust in Lofoten to the intruded lower crust in the Vo *ring Basin is not believed to represent a sharp boundary; it most likely changes gradually as in the model shown by MJELDE et al (1996a).…”
Section: Crystalline Crustmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10), and the lower crustal variation around the lower crustal reflector beneath the Bivrost lineament is also interpreted to indicate an increase in the volume of the intrusions. This southwestward increase of intrusions along the northern Norwegian margin is believed to be in accord with a southwestward increase in the influence of the Iceland hot spot (KODAIRA et al, 1996). It should be noted that the transition from the ''pure continental'' lower crust in Lofoten to the intruded lower crust in the Vo *ring Basin is not believed to represent a sharp boundary; it most likely changes gradually as in the model shown by MJELDE et al (1996a).…”
Section: Crystalline Crustmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Figure 10 also shows a fence diagram along and across the Vo *ring and Lofoten margins inferred from the results of the 1988 and 1992 OBS studies of the Lofoten and Vo *ring margins. The crustal structure across the Lofoten and Vo *ring margins has been thoroughly discussed by MJELDE et al (1993MJELDE et al ( , 1996aMJELDE et al ( , 1997, KODAIRA et al (1996). This section mainly discusses the crustal variation along the Vo *ring-Lofoten margins based on the structure of Line 1, Line 1-N and L8 (Fig.…”
Section: Crystalline Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive studies have been carried out to determine the crustal thickness and velocity structure of the Norwegian continental margin (e.g. Chroston & Brooks 1989; Planke et al 1991; Mjelde et al 1992; Kodaira et al 1995, 1998), very little work appears to have been undertaken on the lithospheric structure (especially the upper mantle) of the margin and Norwegian Sea area. Until now, surface wave studies have been impractical since most of the earthquake events that occur in the vicinity of this region are small ( M < 5.0) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%