2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2020.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptanalysis of a Pairing-free Certificateless Signcryption scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superiority of this scheme is illustrated by comparing the calculation cost and communication cost of a single ciphertext, which is statistically analyzed in table 4. Under the same operating environment, our scheme costs 1.397ms, Kasyoka et al's scheme [30] costs 1.705ms, Karati et al's scheme [31] based no pairing costs 2.424ms, Karati et al's scheme [32] based on bilinear pairing costs 18.913ms, He et al's [33] costs 2.05ms and Seo et al's [35] costs 3.41ms. Compared with the other schemes [30][31][32][33] and [35].…”
Section: Symbol Operation Parameter Runtimecmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superiority of this scheme is illustrated by comparing the calculation cost and communication cost of a single ciphertext, which is statistically analyzed in table 4. Under the same operating environment, our scheme costs 1.397ms, Kasyoka et al's scheme [30] costs 1.705ms, Karati et al's scheme [31] based no pairing costs 2.424ms, Karati et al's scheme [32] based on bilinear pairing costs 18.913ms, He et al's [33] costs 2.05ms and Seo et al's [35] costs 3.41ms. Compared with the other schemes [30][31][32][33] and [35].…”
Section: Symbol Operation Parameter Runtimecmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Under the same operating environment, our scheme costs 1.397ms, Kasyoka et al's scheme [30] costs 1.705ms, Karati et al's scheme [31] based no pairing costs 2.424ms, Karati et al's scheme [32] based on bilinear pairing costs 18.913ms, He et al's [33] costs 2.05ms and Seo et al's [35] costs 3.41ms. Compared with the other schemes [30][31][32][33] and [35]. Our scheme in this paper increases by 18.06%, 42.37%, 92.61%, 31.85% and 59.03% respectively.…”
Section: Symbol Operation Parameter Runtimecmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The security proved under the ROM. In the same year, Kasyoka et al [31] found out the security shortcoming and provided an improved CLC signcryption scheme.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the first CLC scheme was presented by Barbosa and Farshim [23], combining the concepts of CLC and signcryption. Since then, many CLC schemes have been proposed in the literature [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation