5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997) 1997
DOI: 10.21437/eurospeech.1997-241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSLUsh: an extendible research environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous speech technology toolkits, specialising either in speech processing (SFS, [12], Snack, [17]), speech recognition (ISIP, [7], HTK, [19]), dialogue, (CSLU, [15]), annotation (EMU, [2], AGTK, [1]), speech analysis-visualisation (SAPPHIRE, [11], Wavesurfer, [16]). STRAPTk shares several common characteristics with these other toolkits and yet it is different in many aspects because of the specialisation in the domain of speech training.…”
Section: General Speech Application Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous speech technology toolkits, specialising either in speech processing (SFS, [12], Snack, [17]), speech recognition (ISIP, [7], HTK, [19]), dialogue, (CSLU, [15]), annotation (EMU, [2], AGTK, [1]), speech analysis-visualisation (SAPPHIRE, [11], Wavesurfer, [16]). STRAPTk shares several common characteristics with these other toolkits and yet it is different in many aspects because of the specialisation in the domain of speech training.…”
Section: General Speech Application Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capabilities of these software tools also show a wide variation and exhibit a continuous adaptation to the everchanging needs and interests of the speech community. The open source model [1] is increasingly popular, as exemplified by toolkits such as the CSLU Toolkit [2], the Festival Speech Synthesis System [3], and the ISIP Automatic Speech Recognition Toolkit [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did an initial survey of available tools such as Entropic's ESPS/waves+, the Speech viewer in the CSLU toolkit [2], Transcriber from DGA/LDC [5], Syntrillium's CoolEdit, SFS from University College London [6], EMU from Macquarie University [7], and Segmenter/Transcriber from ISIP, Mississippi State University [8]. None of these met all of our requirements, though each of them certainly surpassed them in at least one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%