2013
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/24/245501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu impedance-based detection of superparamagnetic nanoparticles

Abstract: A novel method for superparamagnetic nanoparticle detection using copper impedance as the sensing property is presented. The increase of impedance produced by the proximity of the nanoparticles in the copper is comparable to that of classical magnetoimpeditive materials. A physical interpretation of the detection in terms of the induction of eddy currents in the copper element by the oscillating magnetic moments of the particles is proposed. Experimental research has been done to support this hypothesis, namel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we have developed a quantitative magnetic LFIA for EVs detection [ 38 ]. For this approach, magnetic LFIAs have been coupled to a sensor developed by the authors to get the quantification for different concentration of isolated EVs from human plasma [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have developed a quantitative magnetic LFIA for EVs detection [ 38 ]. For this approach, magnetic LFIAs have been coupled to a sensor developed by the authors to get the quantification for different concentration of isolated EVs from human plasma [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If extrapolated, the best sensor material for detecting NMPs should be one with no MI effect at all. This is not completely surprising, as there is experimental evidence of a larger response from a plain Cu sensor than from an MI amorphous ribbon in a measurement performed in the same conditions [27]. In fact, this behavior could have been anticipated: if the change in the impedance of the sensor in the presence of MNPs is a consequence of changes in the distribution of the electromagnetic field due to the permeability of the particles, then this effect should be larger when the permeability of the sensor itself is smaller than that of the system of MNPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The field used to bias the sensing element (H B in Figure 1) is not enough for that end. In fact, the electrical impedance of nonmagnetic conductors also varies in the presence of magnetic particles and this effect has been proposed as an alternative method for biosensing [75]. More sensitivity is expected if the fringe field of the particles is measured directly using the MI effect as a magnetic field detector.…”
Section: Brief Survey Of Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%