2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu5FeS4 Nanoparticles With Tunable Plasmon Resonances for Efficient Photothermal Therapy of Cancers

Abstract: Localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs) in heavily doped copper chalcogenides are unique because LSPR energy can be adjusted by adjusting doping or stoichiometry. However, there are few investigations on the LSPRs of bimetal copper-based chalcogenides. Herein, bimetal Cu 5 FeS 4 (CFS) nanoparticles were synthesized by a facile hot injection of a molecular precursor. The tunable plasmon resonance absorption of CFS nanoparticles is achieved by the decrease of the ratio of copper to iron and the treatment of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Copper iron sulfides are attractive earth-abundant alternatives due to their low cost, useful band gaps between 0.5 and 1.25 eV, and non-toxicity. Bornite (Cu 5 FeS 4 ) is particularly interesting due to its potential (but unproven) direct band gap; 12,13 to those of copper sulfides (with large infrared LSPRs), including one report claiming tunability of the LSPR with Cu:Fe ratio, 14 while others showed absorbance with supposedly direct band gap behavior 13 or a mix of both. 15 A recent report elaborates on the optical properties of bornite by demonstrating that increasing iron content in bornite causes a resonance at 500 nm (similar to chalcopyrite) and oxidation leads to the infrared LSPR at ∼1000 nm via iron leaching.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Copper iron sulfides are attractive earth-abundant alternatives due to their low cost, useful band gaps between 0.5 and 1.25 eV, and non-toxicity. Bornite (Cu 5 FeS 4 ) is particularly interesting due to its potential (but unproven) direct band gap; 12,13 to those of copper sulfides (with large infrared LSPRs), including one report claiming tunability of the LSPR with Cu:Fe ratio, 14 while others showed absorbance with supposedly direct band gap behavior 13 or a mix of both. 15 A recent report elaborates on the optical properties of bornite by demonstrating that increasing iron content in bornite causes a resonance at 500 nm (similar to chalcopyrite) and oxidation leads to the infrared LSPR at ∼1000 nm via iron leaching.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bornite (Cu 5 FeS 4 ) is particularly interesting due to its potential (but unproven) direct band gap; , however, there have been conflicting reports on the optical properties of bornite, potentially because the material susceptibility to oxidation confounds investigations into the structure−function relationship. Some studies report bornite absorbances similar to those of copper sulfides (with large infrared LSPRs), including one report claiming tunability of the LSPR with Cu:Fe ratio, while others showed absorbance with supposedly direct band gap behavior or a mix of both . A recent report elaborates on the optical properties of bornite by demonstrating that increasing iron content in bornite causes a resonance at 500 nm (similar to chalcopyrite) and oxidation leads to the infrared LSPR at ∼1000 nm via iron leaching .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of the CGO nanoparticle aqueous dispersion displayed high absorption in both the visible and nearinfrared regions, as shown in Figure 2A. The absorbance value was high enough in the NIR region from 600 to 1,100 nm, which showed the typical absorption properties of ternary copper-based compounds (Li et al, 2015;Yuan et al, 2020). By determining the concentration of CGO nanoparticles via ICP-AES, the extinction coefficient of the CGO nanoparticles at 808 nm was measured to be 11.3 L g −1 cm −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Along with the other two satellite peaks of Cu 2– x S and Fe–Cu 2– x S at 168.1 and 168.7 eV, respectively, the existence of S 2– can be proved in the QDs. In addition, the peaks of 720.5 and 712.9 eV in Figure d can be assigned to Fe 3+ in Fe–Cu 2– x S QDs, indicating the valence state of Fe­(III) in the catalyst. Therefore, it was further proved that Fe–Cu 2– x S QDs were successfully synthesized according to the above analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%