1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(71)80044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative radiation effect part I: Fractionated treatment regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

1973
1973
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In evaluating the effect of radiation dose/time/ fractionation patterns, the formula of Kirk et al (2), described as the cumulative radiation effect (CRE) based upon the NSD concept of Ellis (3), was used as a convenient way of comparing the different methods. The possible limitations of these formulae, regarding the description of the true biological effects of the irradiation, have been appreciated (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluating the effect of radiation dose/time/ fractionation patterns, the formula of Kirk et al (2), described as the cumulative radiation effect (CRE) based upon the NSD concept of Ellis (3), was used as a convenient way of comparing the different methods. The possible limitations of these formulae, regarding the description of the true biological effects of the irradiation, have been appreciated (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That curve was generated using the CRE parameters derived from human skin, but it can be readily demonstrated that the general features of Fig. 3, particularly the skewedness, are qualitatively the same for a wide range in values of the exponents of the CRE formulation for fractionated radiation schedules (Kirk et al, 1971). Therefore the small change in point of 32 crypts per circumference, a near-tolerance end-point chosen so that the effect of a gap in treatment could be investigated over as wide a range of tissue damage as possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional single doses, d, given on these regimes are given in the first and second lines in Table I, respectively. These experimental regimes can then be written explicitly as follows: Mean R = 2165 The CREs, R1 and R2, achieved by the first and second schedules, respectively, of these regimes taken alone can be evaluated using the formulation for fractionated treatment schedules presented in Kirk et al (1971): RF = D . N-0-24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kirk et al (9) extended the NSD equations to subtolerance levels of the normal tissue and termed it cumulative radiation etfect (CRE). Orton Douglas & Fowler (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%