Current challenges and future directions for naturopathic medicine in Australia: a qualitative examination of perceptions and experiences from grassroots practice

Abstract

BackgroundNaturopaths are an increasingly significant part of the healthcare sector in Australia, yet despite their significant role there has been little research on this practitioner group. Currently the naturopathic profession in Australia is undergoing a period of rapid professional growth and change. However, to date most research exploring the perceptions of naturopaths has been descriptive in nature and has focused on those in leadership positions rather than grassroots practitioners. This article explores the perceptions and experiences of practising naturopaths on the challenges and future directions of their profession.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 naturopaths practising in the Darling Downs region of South-east Queensland, Australia to explore current perceived challenges in the naturopathic profession in Australia.ResultsParticipants perceived a number of internal and external challenges relating to the profession of naturopathic medicine. These included a public misconception of the role of naturopathic medicine; the co-option of naturopathic medicine by untrained or unqualified practitioners; the devaluation of naturopathic philosophy as a core component of naturopathic practice; a pressure to move towards an evidence-based medicine model focused on product prescription; the increasing commercial interest infiltrating complementary medicine, and; division and fragmentation within the naturopathic profession. Naturopaths generally perceived government regulation as a solution for many of these challenges, though this may be representative of deeper frustrations and disconnections between the views of grassroots naturopaths and those in professional leadership positions.ConclusionsGrassroots naturopaths identify a number of challenges that may have significant impacts on the quality, effectiveness and safety of naturopathic care. Given the significant role naturopaths play in healthcare in Australia the practice and policy implications of these challenges require further research attention.

Practice and research in Australian massage therapy: a national workforce survey

“…This problem does not appear to be unique to massage therapy; a lack of independent CPE activities has also been identified by other CAM practitioners, such as naturopaths, as a major limiting factor in their attempts to remain updated in their research activities. ( 26 , 27 ) Further research exploring possible interventions that increase the accessibility of CPE for massage therapists, as well as effective information on evidence and clinical health care delivery to practitioners, may be warranted to help address these deficiencies. One method of improving CAM practitioner access to research may be to extend information resources for conventional health care practitioners regarding a broader range of health practitioners, such as massage therapists, who currently practise beyond the public health system.…”

Addition and Subtraction Theory of TCM Using Xiao‐Chaihu‐Decoction and Naturopathy in Predicting Survival Outcomes of Primary Liver Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

“…In view of the belief in human body's ability to heal itself through a special vital energy or force guiding bodily processes internally without the adverse effects of conventional medicine, naturopathic practice is an increasingly significant part of the healthcare sector worldwide, having attracted more and more attention recently [38]. Naturopathic treatment has significant benefit especially in the management of patients who failed to be managed by curative treatment; it is also promoted to be another category of treatment in patients with end-stage malignancy [39–41].…”

Student attitudes towards clinical teaching resources in complementary medicine: a focus group examination of Australian naturopathic medicine students

“…A qualitative study of Australian naturopaths highlighted concerns over increasing commercial influence, as practitioners increasingly relied on manufacturers for clinical information (via newsletters, professional seminars and telephone information support services). Further, the lack of other, more objective, sources of information meant that such reliance was often seen as a necessary didactic element . However, while highlighting information sources most utilised by naturopaths, and concerns some naturopaths had of the validity and independence of some sources, these studies did not provide insights into how naturopaths interacted with these information sources in clinical practice or training.…”

“…Further, the lack of other, more objective, sources of information meant that such reliance was often seen as a necessary didactic element. 10 However, while highlighting information sources most utilised by naturopaths, and concerns some naturopaths had of the validity and independence of some sources, these studies did not provide insights into how naturopaths interacted with these information sources in clinical practice or training.…”