2022
DOI: 10.15616/bsl.2022.28.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Diagnostic Methods for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Timely determination of the identity and antibiotic susceptibility profile of contaminating organisms can be crucial in making clinical dosing decisions to combat PJI [53][54][55]. Usually, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of infecting organisms directs the empirical antibiotic treatment regimens [13,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timely determination of the identity and antibiotic susceptibility profile of contaminating organisms can be crucial in making clinical dosing decisions to combat PJI [53][54][55]. Usually, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of infecting organisms directs the empirical antibiotic treatment regimens [13,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ‘chronic’ cases, the clinical manifestation is less clear where the patient may have some pain or discomfort without overt signs [ 8 ]. The current consensus is focused on using thresholds for systemic markers such as C-reactive protein and combining the results of blood tests such as that for leukocyte esterase to guide diagnosis and treatment decisions [ 9 , 10 ]. The gold-standard approach is two-stage revision surgery which removes all implants followed by a period with intravenous (IV) antibiotics and an antibiotic-eluting bone cement spacer protecting the joint space in the meantime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ‘chronic’ cases, the clinical manifestation is less clear where the patient may have some pain or discomfort without overt signs. The current consensus is focused on using thresholds for systemic markers such as C-reactive protein and combining the results of blood tests such as that for leukocyte esterase to guide diagnosis and treatment decisions( 8 , 9 ). The gold-standard approach is two-stage revision surgery which removes all implants followed by a period with intravenous (IV) antibiotics and an antibiotic-eluting bone cement spacer protecting the joint space in the meantime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%