2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Evidence on PET Response Assessment to Immunotherapy in Lymphomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did not observe any instances of pseudoprogression. This observation confirmed a previous analysis of the PET response in these conditions [73].…”
Section: Pet For Assessment Of the Microenvironmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, they did not observe any instances of pseudoprogression. This observation confirmed a previous analysis of the PET response in these conditions [73].…”
Section: Pet For Assessment Of the Microenvironmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In 1997, the introduction of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as rituximab which targeted B-cells exclusively to evoke a direct antitumor cytotoxic effect revolutionalized the treatment paradigm for lymphoma. Then, in 2017, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies which stimulates the immune system via T cells appears to be the next promising step in lymphoma management [1][2][3]. Although immunotherapy now is common terminology for the class of drugs that stimulate the immune system to indirectly target cancer cells, conventionally, immunotherapy refers to any therapy that manipulates the immune system such as both anti-CD20 mAbs and new targeted immunotherapy, ICIs, and cell therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the available 18 F-FDG PET criteria, following the introduction of ICIs some modified response assessment criteria were proposed. These criteria were developed based on the observation that some immunomodulatory drugs can alter tumoral glucose metabolism, changing the assumed association between the 18 F-FDG uptake and treatment efficacy observed under conventional chemotherapy [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly enough, studies have already been performed in order to determine which metabolic criteria could better define the response of HL to immunotherapy; however, no conclusive data are available to date to define which criteria should be used to assess the PET metabolic response in this setting [52]. Finally, given the capability of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT to highlight the presence of hypermetabolism related to inflammation, it has also been used to capture the presence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and to correlate them with patients' outcome [53].…”
Section: Pet-based Response To Icpis In Patients With Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%