2018
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.03.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current guidelines for prostate cancer screening: A systematic review and minimal core proposal

Abstract: Although there are differences between them, it was possible to establish a minimum core of conducts that may be useful in the daily practice of the physician.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that, in some cases, it is possible to use the same antibodies to detect target molecules both in vivo by immuno-PET analysis and ex vivo by immunohistochemistry [24]. The treatment of breast and prostate cancers is based on immunohistochemical analysis of well-known prognostic markers such as ER, PR, Ki67, cerb2 (Figure 1), or PSA [25, 26]. Nevertheless, cancer cells frequently undergo selection during pharmacological treatment, hence possibly changing their dominant molecular phenotype and leading to drug resistance.…”
Section: Diagnostic Imaging and Anatomic Pathology: An Alliance Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that, in some cases, it is possible to use the same antibodies to detect target molecules both in vivo by immuno-PET analysis and ex vivo by immunohistochemistry [24]. The treatment of breast and prostate cancers is based on immunohistochemical analysis of well-known prognostic markers such as ER, PR, Ki67, cerb2 (Figure 1), or PSA [25, 26]. Nevertheless, cancer cells frequently undergo selection during pharmacological treatment, hence possibly changing their dominant molecular phenotype and leading to drug resistance.…”
Section: Diagnostic Imaging and Anatomic Pathology: An Alliance Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While generally accepted as a suitable management option for low risk PCa, AS monitoring regime vary among clinical practices and guidelines, leading to it being questioned by some clinicians and patients [ 10 ]. In effort to minimise this, the Movember Foundation launched the Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance initiative (GAP3) which has combined data from AS cohorts worldwide to create a global consensus for selection, monitoring and treatment intervention thresholds [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 5.8 ng/mL of serum PSA is still surprising for a PC with LN metastases, the direct relationship between serum PSA value and PC extension being well known, only a small proportion of patients (about 5%) with PSA levels of 4.0–10.0 ng/mL having either seminal vesicle or LN involvement [ 18 ]. However, if the rectal resection had not been performed, PC would have remained undiagnosed in a relatively young patient, because Romania offers no implemented screening for PC detection, screening that address men above 50–55 years, according to most of the guidelines developed by the entities recommending the screening for PC [ 19 ]. The involvement of the rectum through PC can produce digestive symptoms such as constipation, alternating constipation and diarrhea, rectal bleeding [ 20 ], narrow stool, abdominal or rectal pain, the urgency of defecation, incontinence [ 21 ], all of can be wrongly attributed to a colonic tumor.…”
Section: ⧉ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%