2018
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Practices in Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in Brazil and Adherence to the IAEA Recommendations: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: BackgroundData on the current situation of nuclear medicine practices in cardiology in Brazil are scarce. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has recommended eight "good practices" to minimize patients' ionizing radiation exposure during myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).ObjectivesTo assess the adoption of the eight good practices in MPS in Brazil.MethodsCross-sectional study with data obtained by use of a questionnaire. All hypothesis tests performed considered a significance level of 5%.Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each patient included in the study gave informed consent to perform pharmacological stress SPECT. The exclusion criteria were the contraindications to the pharmacological stress with vasodilators (a history of severe bronchospasm, asthma during physical activity, severe aortic stenosis, severe obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pregnancy or lactation, 2° or 3° degree, atrioventricular block and atrial node disease, arterial hypotension (SP <90 mmHg), or history of allergic reaction to the previously mentioned drugs) ( 7 ). The collected data included the characteristics of the patients such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), medical information regarding chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia as well as past myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure and the history of medical procedures [percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)] as well as information regarding to the stress MPI procedure: side effects (divided into mild: headache, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, chest discomfort, hot flushes, overall weakness, and severe: bradycardia (defined as heart rate below 60), hypotension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP), <90 or mean blood pressure (MBP) <70 and loss of consciousness] and blood pressure measurements: before the procedure, 5 times during the procedure (every minute) and 4 times after the procedure (every minute).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient included in the study gave informed consent to perform pharmacological stress SPECT. The exclusion criteria were the contraindications to the pharmacological stress with vasodilators (a history of severe bronchospasm, asthma during physical activity, severe aortic stenosis, severe obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pregnancy or lactation, 2° or 3° degree, atrioventricular block and atrial node disease, arterial hypotension (SP <90 mmHg), or history of allergic reaction to the previously mentioned drugs) ( 7 ). The collected data included the characteristics of the patients such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), medical information regarding chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia as well as past myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure and the history of medical procedures [percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)] as well as information regarding to the stress MPI procedure: side effects (divided into mild: headache, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, chest discomfort, hot flushes, overall weakness, and severe: bradycardia (defined as heart rate below 60), hypotension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP), <90 or mean blood pressure (MBP) <70 and loss of consciousness] and blood pressure measurements: before the procedure, 5 times during the procedure (every minute) and 4 times after the procedure (every minute).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data about the presence of present a higher risk for adverse outcomes than those with a normal test. 19,20…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%