2011
DOI: 10.5121/ijmvsc.2011.2401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Research On Reverse Auctions:PART II-Implementation Issues Associated With Putting Competitive Bidding To Work

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many standard models suggest that an increase in competition leads to the lowering of the prices. This negative effect of the competition on the price was analysed in public sector, where prices decreased with an increasing number of participants in tenders [29] or in connection with implementation of electronic reverse auction into practice [30].…”
Section: Competition Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many standard models suggest that an increase in competition leads to the lowering of the prices. This negative effect of the competition on the price was analysed in public sector, where prices decreased with an increasing number of participants in tenders [29] or in connection with implementation of electronic reverse auction into practice [30].…”
Section: Competition Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Pearcy and Giunipero (2006) and Park et al (2012) state that an increase in the number of bidders participating in the auction leads to an increase in the buyer surplus as it intensifies the competition among the bidders in the online market. Smeltzer and Carr (2003) and Wyld (2011) propose that a minimum of five viable bidders is needed to lower purchasing prices by creating a competitive bid environment. Along similar lines, Millet et al (2004) empirically show that the highest price reduction results are obtained by inviting at least five or six, up to a maximum of 13.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, using a private auction platform may lead a deteriorating buyer and supplier relationships. Because, once a buyer runs its own auction platform, the suppliers could become skeptical as to the legitimacy of bids or come to believe that the auction platform is being manipulated by the owner (Wyld 2011). The discontent among suppliers for the auctions conducted with the private platforms starts adversely affecting suppliers' bidding behaviors.…”
Section: Hypotheses Regarding the Procurement Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation