Current State and Future Directions of Intranasal Delivery Route for Central Nervous System Disorders: A Scientometric and Visualization Analysis

Abstract

Background: The management of various central nervous system (CNS) disorders has been challenging, due to highly compact blood-brain barrier (BBB) impedes the access of most pharmacological agents to the brain. Among multiple strategies proposed to circumvent this challenge, intranasal delivery route has sparked great interest for brain targeting in the past decades. The aim of this study was to apply scientometric method to estimate the current status and future trends of the field from a holistic perspective.Methods: All relevant publications during 1998–2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE, 1998-present). Two different scientometric software including VOS viewer and CiteSpace, and one online platform were used to conduct co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis of journals, countries, institutes, authors, references and keywords.Results: A total of 2,928 documents, including 2,456 original articles and 472 reviews, were retrieved. Our analysis revealed a significant increasing trend in the total number of scientific publications over the past 2 decades (R2 = 0.98). The United States dominated the field, reflecting in the largest amount of publications (971), the highest H-index (99), and extensive international collaboration. Jamia Hamdard contributed to most publications. Frey WH and Illum L were key researchers with the highest number of publications and citations, respectively. The International Journal of Pharmaceutics was the most influential academic journal, and Pharmacology/Pharmacy and Neurosciences/Neurology were the hottest research categories in this field. Based on keywords occurrence analysis, four main topics were identified, and the current research focus of this field has shifted from cluster 4 (pathways and mechanisms of intranasal delivery) to cluster 2 (the study of nasal drug delivery systems), especially the nanostructured and nano-sized carrier systems. Keywords burst detection revealed that the research focus on oxidative stress, drug delivery, neuroinflammation, nanostructured lipid carrier, and formulation deserves our continued attention.Conclusion: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first scientometric analysis regarding intranasal delivery research. This study has demonstrated a comprehensive knowledge map, development landscape and future directions of intranasal delivery research, which provides a practical and valuable reference for scholars and policymakers in this field.

Knowledge Mapping of the Links Between the Gut Microbiota and Heart Failure: A Scientometric Investigation (2006–2021)

“…Conceptual design of the study is presented in Supplementary Figure 1 . All valid documents retrieved from WoSCC were converted to CiteSpace version 5.8.R2 (developed by Professor Chen Chaomei from Drexel University), VOS viewer version 1.6.17.0 (developed by Professor Eck and Waltman from Leiden University) and online platform 1 for visual analysis ( 11 , 13 , 14 ). The parameters of CiteSpace were as follows: time span (2006–2021), years per slice ( 2 ), selection criteria (Top 50).…”

Mapping Knowledge Structure and Themes Trends of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…BC is an indicator of the centrality of a node, which can reflect the importance of nodes within the networks. Generally, nodes with a BC value of more than 0.1 occupy pivotal positions connecting a large number of nodes and are usually identified as hubs of nodes displayed in purple rings ( 21 , 30 ). It can be seen that the University of Alabama Birmingham was the only institution with a BC value of more than 0.1, which suggests that other institutions have not formed a strong influence in the field.…”

“…Furthermore, reference co-citation analysis was a valuable technique to assess the evolution and trace the developmental frontiers of any research field ( 21 ). After running the bibliometric analysis in CiteSpace, a visualization network of cited references was plotted in Figure 6A .…”

“…Bibliometrics is a feasible method to analyze the scientific production quantitatively and qualitatively and the current status of a given research field. With the development of information technologies, the information visualization of bibliometrics has been achieved and several freeware bibliometric tools including CiteSpace ( 16 ), VoSviewer ( 17 ), R-bibliometrix ( 18 ), and HistCite ( 19 ) have been widely used medical fields such as orthopedics ( 20 ), neurology ( 21 ), oncology ( 22 , 23 ), and rheumatology ( 24 ). Taking RA and osteoporosis as examples, Schöffel et al ( 24 ), have performed the first bibliometric analysis of 78,128 documents regarding RA during the period 1901–2007.…”

Research Hotspots and Trends Analysis of Patellar Instability: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2021

“…Firstly, in our study, we only searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and did not incorporate other databases, such as PubMed, Scopus or Embase. However, it may be unscientific to merge and analyze the data from multiple databases, because different databases have different measurement of citation frequency counting and classification of publications ( 9 , 86 ).…”