Customer knowledge management competence evaluation of tourism enterprises based on ahp-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

Abstract

With the fierce competition under the background of knowledge-based economy, tourism enterprises are increasingly aware that they must turn their focus from traditional products to customers for the sake of survival and development. Integrating the customer relationship management and knowledge management, the customer knowledge management (CKM) has aroused higher attention from the tourism enterprises. As for how to determine the factors influencing the Customer knowledge management competence (CKMC) of tourism enterprises and their weights, an index system was established for evaluating CKMC of tourism enterprises based on the balanced score card (BSC) and knowledge management process, the weight design and consistency check of the indexes were implemented using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the overall evaluation value and concrete index scores at all levels were obtained via the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. In the end, the scientificity and operability of the evaluation model were verified through an empirical analysis of China Youth Travel Service (CYTS). The results show that: (1) The business process, customer communication, system support, and market performance are important level I indexes used to measure the CKMC; (2) The key Level II factors influencing the CKMC of enterprises include customer knowledge sharing mechanism, timeliness of customer communication, degree of importance attached by senior leadership, and customer acquisition rate; (3) The evaluation model based on AHP and fuzzy evaluation method can objectively describe the overall up-to-standard degree of enterprises’ CKMC, and clearly identify the strengths and weaknesses. This research shows that the combination of AHP and fuzzy evaluation-based method is capable of more scientific and complete evaluation of CKMC, compensates for the deficiencies of single evaluation model, and provides a new method for the effective improvement of enterprises’ CKMC.

Quality Evaluation of College Employment Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Immersive Virtual Realization Technology

“…In addition, it is believed that decent work covers two levels of employment quality and employment quantity in connotation, the so-called decent work is actually the good or bad level of employment quality, and the production work with high employment quality corresponds to decent work [6]. Some scholars argue that the quality of employment is actually a measure of the comprehensive employment status of workers in the process of completing their employment behavior [7]. e quality of employment includes nine aspects, namely, working conditions, health and welfare, equal opportunities, whether to enjoy social security, the nature of work, training and career prospects, labor relations, personal dignity, and safety.…”

Enhancing Supplier Participation in New Product Development through Strategic Procurement: A Study of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

“…It is a critical factor in supplier selection and evaluation, as it determines whether a supplier can provide the necessary resources and expertise to support the buyer's operations and strategic objectives (Wang, Chan, & Li, 2017). Supplier capability includes both tangible and intangible factors, such as technical expertise, production capacity, financial stability, and organizational culture (Chen, Jiao, & Wang, 2018). In the context of new product development, supplier capability plays a crucial role in determining the success or failure of collaborative efforts between buyers and suppliers (Zhou & Wu, 2019).…”

Research on the evaluation model of rural colony tourism resources based on AHP

“…Based on these interrelationships, the indicator factors should be divided into several groups and hierarchical layers. Generally, sub-indicators falling under the same primary indicators are governed by them, while indicators that do not belong to the same group possess distinct characteristics and are associated with different higher-level indicators [12] . Special cases also occur, usually in ladder hierarchies with complex relationships, usually when the relationship between different groups is not clear, and sometimes when there are intersecting hierarchies, but whatever the relationship between them, the lower level belongs to the upper level and is obvious.…”