Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: Stakeholder-Driven Concept Mapping Approach

Abstract

BackgroundCyberbullying includes bullying behaviors on the Web; these behaviors are inconsistently measured and lack standardized definitions. The Uniform Definition of Bullying provides a consensus-based definition of bullying, and it highlights the need for an evidence-based definition of a model for cyberbullying.ObjectiveToward understanding the key elements and constructs defining cyberbullying, the objective of this study was to develop a stakeholder-driven conceptual model of cyberbullying.MethodsConcept mapping is a validated research method that leverages both qualitative and quantitative approaches to integrate stakeholder input on complex topics. This process was used to develop a concept map and adapt it through participant input to a conceptual model. The validated concept mapping approach includes 5 steps: preparation, generation (brainstorming), structuring (sorting), representation (statistical analysis), and interpretation. We recruited stakeholder participants, including adolescents, as well as parents and professionals representing education, health, and the justice system. Analysis included hierarchical cluster analysis to develop a cluster map representing cyberbullying, followed by adaptation of that map to a conceptual model through qualitative participant feedback.ResultsA total of 177 participants contributed to the concept mapping process, including 69% females, 50% adults, and 68% Caucasian, representing each of our stakeholder groups. A total of 228 brainstorming items were generated and sorted into a concept map that included 9 clusters. Clusters included topics that had strong overlap with traditional bullying, such as consequences for perpetrators and targets, with example items “alienating” and “crippling.” Some clusters were unique, such as cyberbullying techniques, with example item “excessive messaging,” and characteristics of the cyberbullying experience, with example item “constant.” Through the interpretation step, a conceptual model emerged, illustrating connections and distinctions between traditional bullying and cyberbullying.ConclusionsWe found that in generating a stakeholder-driven concept map of cyberbullying, participants could not describe cyberbullying without integrating key concepts from traditional bullying. On the basis of our conceptual model, there are unique characteristics of cyberbullying that suggest that uniform definitions of bullying need to be evaluated to ensure their application to cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying and post-traumatic stress symptoms in UK adolescents

“…This pattern was not found between different types of cyberbullying roles, such as traditional bullies and cybervictims. This supports the hypothesis that social media may have simply provided a new and powerful platform for bullying 22. In fact, 26.7% of the cybervictims were not involved in any form of traditional bullying.…”

How are parenting practices associated with bullying in adolescents? A cross‐sectional study

“…Cyberbullying is understood by adolescents as constant “aggressive, intent to harm, disrespectful, and hostile” behaviour through internet devices (Moreno et al., 2019). Cyberbullying roles have been traditionally split into victims, known as cybervictims, and aggressors, known as cyberbullies.…”