Cyberethics and Co-operation in the Information Society

Fuchs, Christian; Bichler, Robert; Raffl, Celina

doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9138-1

Cited by 18 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Conflicts are mentioned in numerous abstracts [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] ranging from -whether the discourse of corporate social responsibility will improve understanding among stakeholders and lead to mutually acceptable resolutions to conflict‖ [68] to -educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests‖ [69]. We submit that many possible conflicts are not mentioned in the documents.…”

Section: Maintenance Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens

Wolbring

Rybchinski

2013

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The present journal recently stated in the call for a special issue on social sustainability, - [t]hough sustainable development is said to rest on ‗three pillars', one of these-social sustainability-has received significantly less attention than its bio-physical environmental and economic counterparts‖. The current issue promises to engage the concepts of -development sustainability‖, -bridge sustainability‖ and -maintenance sustainability‖ and the tensions between these different aspects of social sustainability. The aim of the present study is to identify the visibility of disabled people in the academic social sustainability literature, to ascertain the impact and promises of social sustainability indicators put forward in the same literature and to engage especially with the concepts of -development sustainability‖, -bridge sustainability‖ and -maintenance sustainability‖ through disability studies and ability studies lenses. We report that disabled people are barely covered in the academic social sustainability literature; of the 5165 academic articles investigated only 26 had content related to disabled people and social sustainability. We also conclude that social sustainability indicators evident in the 1909 academic articles with the phrase -social sustainability‖ in the abstract mostly focused on products and did not reflect yet the goals outlined in the -development sustainability‖ aspect of social sustainability proposed by Vallance such as basic needs, building social capital, justice and so on. We posit that if the focus within the social sustainability discourse shifts more toward the social that an active presence of disabled people in this OPEN ACCESS Sustainability 2013, 5 4890 discourse is essential to disabled people. We showcase the utility of an ability studies lens to further the development and application of the -development sustainability‖, -bridge sustainability‖ and -maintenance sustainability‖ concepts. We outline how different ability expectations intrinsic to certain schools of thought of how to deal with human-nature relationships (for example anthropocentric versus bio/ecocentric) impact this relationship and -bridge sustainability‖. As to -maintenance development‖, we posit that no engagement has happened yet with the ability expectation conflicts between able-bodied and disabled people, or for that matter with the ability expectation differences between different able-bodied groups within social sustainability discourses; an analysis essential for the maintenance of development. In general, we argue that there is a need to generate ability expectation conflict maps and ability expectations conflict resolution mechanisms for all sustainable development discourses individually and for ability conflicts between sustainable development discourses.

show abstract

Section: Maintenance Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens

Wolbring

Rybchinski

2013

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since ethics is generally based on the notion of right and wrong, in most cases to the layman, whatever act that is not intentionally aimed at causing harm to another is often considered ethical; and there are some polemical arguments that uphold this viewpoint. Christian et al (2009), gave perspective to this reality in trying to explain a dichotomy between rules, norms and values; positing that "Rules are (prescribed) techniques or procedures of action, norms are regularized rules achieved by routinized, repeated, and repeatable action, [while] values are a weighting and an evaluation of rules and/or norms according to moral judgements in terms of good and evil. These three components can be found on the individual and on the social levels of the moral system.…”

Section: 'Ethics Of Legality' In a Tension Of Autonomiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

'Global cybersecurity legislation' - factors, perspective and implications

Ogu

Ogu²,

Oluoha

2020

IJBCRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As at the time of this research, no globally adopted and unified legislation for cybersecurity exists that is currently operational, despite rife global clamours for such a legislative framework. This research paper synthesizes and reviews some of the key imposing factors, putting in perspective the surrounding realities that impede the successful actualisation of such a framework, using the qualitative-exploratory research methodology. Also, presenting the implications of these factors and associated realities for cyber peacekeeping and the struggle for a utopian global information society, and then proposing recommendations pertaining the feasibility and operability of a global cybersecurity legal framework.

show abstract

“…The challenge for cyber ethics is to discuss principles of morality that can guide human action so that people are empowered to establish a sustainable, participatory global information society [26]. Cyber ethics can discuss real possibilities of development of the information society and criticize ideologies that portray the information society in uncritical and one-dimensional ways [26].…”

Section: A Review On Cyber Ethics Definition and Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cyber ethics can discuss real possibilities of development of the information society and criticize ideologies that portray the information society in uncritical and one-dimensional ways [26]. By e-mail or newsgroup, any sort of opinions and thoughts can be spread all over the world.…”

Section: A Review On Cyber Ethics Definition and Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

e-Government Ethics : a Synergy of Computer Ethics, Information Ethics, and Cyber Ethics

Ramadhan¹,

Sensuse²,

Arymurthy³

2011

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Ethics has become an important part in the interaction among humans being. This paper specifically discusses applied ethics as one type of ethics. There are three applied ethics that will be reviewed in this paper, i.e. computer ethics, information ethics, and cyber ethics. There are two aspects of the three applied ethics that were reviewed, i.e. their definition and the issues associated with them. The reviewing results of the three applied ethics are then used for defining e-Government ethics and formulating the issues of e-Government ethics. The eGovernment ethics position, based on the previous three applied ethics, is also described in this paper. Computer ethics, information ethics and cyber ethics are considered as the foundations of e-Government ethics and several others applied ethics could enrich the e-Government ethics.

show abstract

Cyberethics and Co-operation in the Information Society

Cited by 18 publications

References 17 publications

Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens

Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens

'Global cybersecurity legislation' - factors, perspective and implications

e-Government Ethics : a Synergy of Computer Ethics, Information Ethics, and Cyber Ethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About