2009
DOI: 10.1159/000251966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic and Array-CGH Characterization of a Complex de novo Rearrangement Involving Duplication and Deletion of 9p and Clinical Findings in a 4-Month-Old Female

Abstract: Approximately 15 patients with partial trisomy 9p involving de novo duplications have been previously described. Here, we present clinical, cytogenetic, FISH and aCGH findings in a patient with a de novo complex rearrangement in the short arm of chromosome 9 involving an inverted duplication at 9p24→p21.3 and a deletion at 9pter→p24.2. FISH probes generated from BACs selected from the UCSC genome browser were utilized to verify this rearrangement. It is likely that some previously described duplications of 9p … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results of Swinkels et al [2008] show that developmental features in children with 9p deletions are independent of the size of the deletion and they could not establish clear genotype-phenotype correlation for developmental aspects in the 9p deletion syndrome. Hulick et al [2009] reported the most similar case to the currently presented patient, but even here the duplication is about 4 Mb smaller than in our case and the deletion about 1 Mb larger. In contrast to our patient, their proband had cleft palate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, results of Swinkels et al [2008] show that developmental features in children with 9p deletions are independent of the size of the deletion and they could not establish clear genotype-phenotype correlation for developmental aspects in the 9p deletion syndrome. Hulick et al [2009] reported the most similar case to the currently presented patient, but even here the duplication is about 4 Mb smaller than in our case and the deletion about 1 Mb larger. In contrast to our patient, their proband had cleft palate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Jelin et al [2010] suggested 2 candidate genes for clefting in 9p22: CER1 and FREM1 . Although both patients have duplication of both FREM1 and CER1, only the patient reported by Hulick et al [2009] has a cleft lip. It has already been shown that not all cases with duplications of 9p22p24 result in orofacial clefting [Jelin et al, 2010].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, several authors described complex inversions and insertion-translocations, which, depending on the definition applied, may or may not have been labeled CCRs [Madan and Menko, 1992;Bernardini et al, 2008;Jiang et al, 2008;Lybaek et al, 2008;de Vree et al, 2009;Poot et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2010]. A special case of a CCR involving a single chromosome is the inversion-duplication-distal deletion rearrangement [Hulick et al, 2009;van Binsbergen et al, 2012;Kowalczyk et al, 2013;Trachoo et al, 2013]. These studies indicated that rearrangements involving only a single chromosome can also be 'complex'.…”
Section: Definition and Classification Of Ccrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and Table 2) (Al Achkar et al, 2010;Hulik et al, 2009;Swinkles et al, 2008). All show features shared by 9p deletion and 9p duplication syndromes, such as developmental delay, psychomotor retardation, hypotonia and low-set ears, but the manifestation of syndromespecific features is variable and depends on the length of the different genomic regions involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%