2011
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival of gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: evidence from an experimental study

Abstract: BackgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been considered as a promising treatment modality for gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, there have also been many debates regarding the efficacy and safety of this new approach. Results from experimental animal model study could help provide reliable information. This study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC to treat gastric cancer with PC in a rabbit model.MethodsV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important finding was that the median OS could be extended from 8.5 months in Control group to 13.7 months in Study group, with survival prolong rate (SPR) of 61.2%. This improvement is comparable with both experimental studies (23 vs. 40 days, SPR 60% ; 43 vs. 75 days, SPR 74% ) and clinical studies by Yang et al (6.5 vs. 11.0 months, SPR 69%), Verwaal et al (12.6 vs. 22.3 months, SPR 77%), Elias et al (23.9 vs. 62.7 months, SPR 162%), and Cashin et al (23.9 vs. 36.5 months, SPR 53%). Although this is not a strictly randomized study, and the two groups were different in terms of operation complexities, as the HIPEC group had more abdominal areas resection than the control group and thus longer operation time, there was no major selection bias in this study that could account for such big differences in OS.…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The most important finding was that the median OS could be extended from 8.5 months in Control group to 13.7 months in Study group, with survival prolong rate (SPR) of 61.2%. This improvement is comparable with both experimental studies (23 vs. 40 days, SPR 60% ; 43 vs. 75 days, SPR 74% ) and clinical studies by Yang et al (6.5 vs. 11.0 months, SPR 69%), Verwaal et al (12.6 vs. 22.3 months, SPR 77%), Elias et al (23.9 vs. 62.7 months, SPR 162%), and Cashin et al (23.9 vs. 36.5 months, SPR 53%). Although this is not a strictly randomized study, and the two groups were different in terms of operation complexities, as the HIPEC group had more abdominal areas resection than the control group and thus longer operation time, there was no major selection bias in this study that could account for such big differences in OS.…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The present study provides further evidence to support this idea. Moreover, we may suggest using an intraperitoneal application of acetic acid (but not ethanol) alone or in combination with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal cancer . In the future, it will be of interest to test this idea in proper animal models by combining acetic acid with cisplatin, mitomycin‐C, 5‐FU, leucovorin, paclitaxel, S‐1, doxorubicin, and irinotecan …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also showed that PDOX and HIPEC had a much more tolerable side-effect profile than the doxorubicin treatments. 68 Similarly, in another study, Tang et al 69 found that CRS-HIPEC could increase the survival of their diseased rabbits by 60%. Moreover, based on peripheral blood cell counts, liver function, kidney function, and blood chemistries, the side effects were comparable between the control group and the CRS-HIPEC group.…”
Section: Translational Research On Hipecmentioning
confidence: 99%