2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0934-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotype coexistence in the field cannot be explained by inter-cytotype hybridization alone: linking experiments and computer simulations in the sexual species Pilosella echioides (Asteraceae)

Abstract: BackgroundProcesses driving ploidal diversity at the population level are virtually unknown. Their identification should use a combination of large-scale screening of ploidy levels in the field, pairwise crossing experiments and mathematical modelling linking these two types of data. We applied this approach to determine the drivers of frequencies of coexisting cytotypes in mixed-ploidy field populations of the fully sexual plant species Pilosella echioides. We examined fecundity and ploidal diversity in seeds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical impacts of reproductive assurance and population size on polyploid establishment have been examined in previously published deterministic and stochastic models (Rodriguez, 1996;Baack, 2005;Rausch and Morgan, 2005;Oswald and Nuismer, 2011;Fowler and Levin, 2016;Chrtek et al, 2017), and the results presented here are qualitatively similar to the results of those studies. However, these factors have not been studied extensively within a spatial context (aside from Baack, 2005).…”
Section: Model Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The theoretical impacts of reproductive assurance and population size on polyploid establishment have been examined in previously published deterministic and stochastic models (Rodriguez, 1996;Baack, 2005;Rausch and Morgan, 2005;Oswald and Nuismer, 2011;Fowler and Levin, 2016;Chrtek et al, 2017), and the results presented here are qualitatively similar to the results of those studies. However, these factors have not been studied extensively within a spatial context (aside from Baack, 2005).…”
Section: Model Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In recent decades, several mechanisms facilitating successful polyploid establishment and/or cytotype coexistence have been proposed (reviewed by Kolář et al, 2017). For example, the minority status of one of the coexisting cytotypes may be overcome by its recurrent origin (Ramsey, 2007), efficient vegetative spread (Chrtek et al, 2017), autogamy (Petit et al, 1997), non-random mating (Husband et al, 2008) or a substantial competitive advantage (Felber, 1991). Prominent among these mechanisms is the (fine-scale) spatial segregation of cytotypes, which can increase the rate of compatible, within-ploidy mating (Baack, 2005;Kolář et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longevity along with the ability to reproduce vegetatively and by selfing and, consequently, the lack of a need for regular sexual reproduction probably enabled V. uliginosum s. lat. to escape minority cytotype exclusion (see also Chrtek et al 2017). In other polyploid complexes spatial segregation is identified as an important driver of successful cytotype co-occurrence, for example in Chamerion angustifolium (Sabara et al 2013), Gymnadenia conopsea (Trávníček et al 2011b), Knautia arvensis (Kolář et al 2009), Pilosella echioides (Trávníček et al 2011a) and Senecio carniolicus s. lat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%