D4.4 Report and recommendations on FAIR incentives and expected impacts in the Nordics, Baltics and EOSC

Nordling, Josefine; Assinen, Pauli; Fuchs, Siiri-Anna; Kuusniemi, Mari Elisa; Lembinen, Liisi; Mihai, Hannah; Alaterä, Tuomas; Meerman, Bert; Vecpuise, Elza; Ivarsson, Lars-Owe

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6881009

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, funders could put more emphasis on data sharing as a part of good scientific practice in cooperation with and support from the scientific community. Additionally, German funders could take a closer look at international best practice examples for incentivising data sharing [82][83][84].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

German funders’ data sharing policies—A qualitative interview study

Anger,

Wendelborn,

Schickhardt

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Data sharing is commonly seen as beneficial for science but is not yet common practice. Research funding agencies are known to play a key role in promoting data sharing, but German funders’ data sharing policies appear to lag behind in international comparison. This study aims to answer the question of how German data sharing experts inside and outside funding agencies perceive and evaluate German funders’ data sharing policies and overall efforts to promote data sharing. Methods This study is based on sixteen guided expert interviews with representatives of German funders and German research data experts from stakeholder organisations, who shared their perceptions of German’ funders efforts to promote data sharing. By applying the method of qualitative content analysis to our interview data, we categorise and describe noteworthy aspects of the German data sharing policy landscape and illustrate our findings with interview passages. Results We present our findings in five sections to distinguish our interviewees’ perceptions on a) the status quo of German funders’ data sharing policies, b) the role of funders in promoting data sharing, c) current and potential measures by funders to promote data sharing, d) general barriers to those measures, and e) the implementation of more binding data sharing requirements. Discussion and conclusion Although funders are perceived to be important promoters and facilitators of data sharing throughout our interviews, only few German funding agencies have data sharing policies in place. Several interviewees stated that funders could do more, for example by providing incentives for data sharing or by introducing more concrete policies. Our interviews suggest the academic freedom of grantees is widely perceived as an obstacle for German funders in introducing mandatory data sharing requirements. However, some interviewees stated that stricter data sharing requirements could be justified if data sharing is a part of good scientific practice.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%