1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dairy cattle as a bioindicator of exposure to genotoxic substances in a heavily polluted area in Northern Bohemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutagenic tests have been applied to study the chromosome fragility (or stability) on cells exposed both in vivo and in vitro to mutagens or chemicals, suspected to have mutagenic activity (Mrdjanovic et al, 2014;Lovreglio et al, 2014). In particular, the cytogenetic tests we used in the present study have been applied in both human and animal lymphocytes, often revealing a higher chromosome fragility, compared to control groups (in vivo exposure) or control unexposed cells (in vitro exposure) (Rubes et al, 1997;Lioi et al, 1998;Picco et al, 2004;Iannuzzi et al, 2004;Perucatti et al, 2006;Santoro et al, 2008;Bonassi et al, 2008;Di Meo et al, 2011;Genualdo et al, 2012;Siviková and Dianovsky, 2006;Sivikova et al, 2013;Georgieva et al, 2013;Genualdo et al, 2015;Perucatti et al, 2015;Iannuzzi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutagenic tests have been applied to study the chromosome fragility (or stability) on cells exposed both in vivo and in vitro to mutagens or chemicals, suspected to have mutagenic activity (Mrdjanovic et al, 2014;Lovreglio et al, 2014). In particular, the cytogenetic tests we used in the present study have been applied in both human and animal lymphocytes, often revealing a higher chromosome fragility, compared to control groups (in vivo exposure) or control unexposed cells (in vitro exposure) (Rubes et al, 1997;Lioi et al, 1998;Picco et al, 2004;Iannuzzi et al, 2004;Perucatti et al, 2006;Santoro et al, 2008;Bonassi et al, 2008;Di Meo et al, 2011;Genualdo et al, 2012;Siviková and Dianovsky, 2006;Sivikova et al, 2013;Georgieva et al, 2013;Genualdo et al, 2015;Perucatti et al, 2015;Iannuzzi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and waste products of industrial plants. [22] The exposure of dairy cattle to genotoxic substances showed a significantly higher count of aberrant cells estimated using cytogenetic analysis of bovine peripheral lymphocytes: [23] the main source of chemical substances was the feeding of roughage and fresh fodder. In livestock, exposure to genotoxic agents may result in mutations, metabolic disorders, immunosuppression and reduced fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, SCE is a short-term test for the detection of reciprocal exchanges of DNA between two sister chromatids, involving DNA breakage and subsequent re-junction. The increased frequencies of SCE due to negative conditions, like pollutant exposition, lead to DNA single strand breaks as reported in several studies on livestock populations (Rubes et al, 1997;Di Meo et al, 2000Iannuzzi et al, 2004;Perucatti et al, 2006;Genualdo et al, 2012;Wójcik and Smalec, 2013). The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of environmental pollutants in some areas of Sardinia Island on the genome of sheep flocks living in this region by using the SCE test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%