Damage control in the injured patient

Hsu, Jeremy; Pham, Tam N.

doi:10.4103/2229-5151.79285

Cited by 26 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The third component is the definitive surgical repair that is performed only when target parameters have been achieved [ 133 , 426 – 428 , 431 – 433 ]. Although the concept of “damage control” intuitively makes sense, no RCTs exist to support it.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Severe traumatic injury continues to present challenges to healthcare systems around the world, and post-traumatic bleeding remains a leading cause of potentially preventable death among injured patients. Now in its fifth edition, this document aims to provide guidance on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following traumatic injury and encourages adaptation of the guiding principles described here to individual institutional circumstances and resources. Methods: The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was founded in 2004, and the current author group included representatives of six relevant European professional societies. The group applied a structured, evidence-based consensus approach to address scientific queries that served as the basis for each recommendation and supporting rationale. Expert opinion and current clinical practice were also considered, particularly in areas in which randomised clinical trials have not or cannot be performed. Existing recommendations were reexamined and revised based on scientific evidence that has emerged since the previous edition and observed shifts in clinical practice. New recommendations were formulated to reflect current clinical concerns and areas in which new research data have been generated. Results: Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of post-traumatic coagulopathy have supported improved management strategies, including evidence that early, individualised goal-directed treatment improves the outcome of severely injured patients. The overall organisation of the current guideline has been designed to reflect the clinical decision-making process along the patient pathway in an approximate temporal sequence. Recommendations are grouped behind the rationale for key decision points, which are patient-or problem-oriented rather than related to specific treatment modalities. While these recommendations provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of major bleeding and coagulopathy, emerging evidence supports the author group's belief that the greatest outcome improvement can be achieved through education and the establishment of and adherence to local clinical management algorithms. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidance are key to improving patient outcomes. If incorporated into local practice, these clinical practice guidelines have the potential to ensure a uniform standard of care across Europe and beyond and better outcomes for the severely bleeding trauma patient.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The third component is the definitive surgical repair that is performed only when target parameters have been achieved [ 95 , 317 – 320 , 323 , 324 ]. Although the concept of “damage control” intuitively makes sense, no RCTs exist to support it.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSevere trauma continues to represent a global public health issue and mortality and morbidity in trauma patients remains substantial. A number of initiatives have aimed to provide guidance on the management of trauma patients. This document focuses on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma and encourages adaptation of the guiding principles to each local situation and implementation within each institution.MethodsThe pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was founded in 2004 and included representatives of six relevant European professional societies. The group used a structured, evidence-based consensus approach to address scientific queries that served as the basis for each recommendation and supporting rationale. Expert opinion and current clinical practice were also considered, particularly in areas in which randomised clinical trials have not or cannot be performed. Existing recommendations were reconsidered and revised based on new scientific evidence and observed shifts in clinical practice; new recommendations were formulated to reflect current clinical concerns and areas in which new research data have been generated. This guideline represents the fourth edition of a document first published in 2007 and updated in 2010 and 2013.ResultsThe guideline now recommends that patients be transferred directly to an appropriate trauma treatment centre and encourages use of a restricted volume replacement strategy during initial resuscitation. Best-practice use of blood products during further resuscitation continues to evolve and should be guided by a goal-directed strategy. The identification and management of patients pre-treated with anticoagulant agents continues to pose a real challenge, despite accumulating experience and awareness. The present guideline should be viewed as an educational aid to improve and standardise the care of the bleeding trauma patients across Europe and beyond. This document may also serve as a basis for local implementation. Furthermore, local quality and safety management systems need to be established to specifically assess key measures of bleeding control and outcome.ConclusionsA multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidance are key to improving patient outcomes. The implementation of locally adapted treatment algorithms should strive to achieve measureable improvements in patient outcome.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1265-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…If complementary angiography and/or further injury investigation is needed, it should be performed. The third component is the definitive surgical repair that is performed only when target parameters have been achieved [63,249,276-278,281,282]. Although the concept of "damage control" intuitively makes sense, no RCTs exist to support it.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline

Bouillon²,

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionEvidence-based recommendations are needed to guide the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient. When these recommendations are implemented patient outcomes may be improved.MethodsThe multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was formed in 2005 with the aim of developing a guideline for the management of bleeding following severe injury. This document represents an updated version of the guideline published by the group in 2007 and updated in 2010. Recommendations were formulated using a nominal group process, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) hierarchy of evidence and based on a systematic review of published literature.ResultsKey changes encompassed in this version of the guideline include new recommendations on the appropriate use of vasopressors and inotropic agents, and reflect an awareness of the growing number of patients in the population at large treated with antiplatelet agents and/or oral anticoagulants. The current guideline also includes recommendations and a discussion of thromboprophylactic strategies for all patients following traumatic injury. The most significant addition is a new section that discusses the need for every institution to develop, implement and adhere to an evidence-based clinical protocol to manage traumatically injured patients. The remaining recommendations have been re-evaluated and graded based on literature published since the last edition of the guideline. Consideration was also given to changes in clinical practice that have taken place during this time period as a result of both new evidence and changes in the general availability of relevant agents and technologies.ConclusionsA comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to trauma care and mechanisms with which to ensure that established protocols are consistently implemented will ensure a uniform and high standard of care across Europe and beyond.Please see related letter by Morel et alhttp://ccforum.com/content/17/4/442

show abstract

Damage control in the injured patient

Cited by 26 publications

References 72 publications

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition

Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About