2016
DOI: 10.3311/ppci.7646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Diagnosis of Structures Using Modal Data and Static Response

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Damage identification using three different objective functions based on residuals obtained from static and modal measurements has been proposed by Kourehli [21]. He applied simulated annealing to verify his method on a four-story steel frame proposed as IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage identification using three different objective functions based on residuals obtained from static and modal measurements has been proposed by Kourehli [21]. He applied simulated annealing to verify his method on a four-story steel frame proposed as IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure is shown in Fig. 16(a), 59,60 which is a 4-story, 2-by-2 bay steel frame scale-model structure located in the Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Its dimensions are 2.5 m  2.5 m  3.6 m (width  length  height) and its physical characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Properties Of the Benchmark Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The effectiveness of the two mentioned techniques in diagnosing damages has been studied by researchers [13]. Among these studies, many researchers have used two dynamic characteristics simultaneously for improving the efficiency of their crack detection procedure [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%