2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark coffee consumption protects human blood cells from spontaneous DNA damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, none of the studies provided by the applicant unequivocally demonstrates that the proposed changes in cytosolic and nuclear concentrations of Nrf2, the expression and activity of ARE/EpRE‐dependent enzymes, or any other cellular cascade triggered by coffee constituents, directly affects DNA strand breaks in humans and as such improves DNA integrity. In particular, the only human intervention study that investigated DNA strand breaks and Nrf2 translocation, which was provided by the applicant and is described above (Pahlke et al., ), did not allow conclusions to be drawn on the link between Nrf2 translocation and DNA strand breaks, owing to the methodological limitations of this study. The other human studies that were provided by the applicant (Boettler et al., 2011a; Volz et al., ), compared in one‐arm sequential trials Nrf2‐gene transcription levels in periods in which subjects refrained from coffee consumption and restricted the amounts of polyphenols in the diet with periods of coffee consumption, but did not investigate DNA strand breaks.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, none of the studies provided by the applicant unequivocally demonstrates that the proposed changes in cytosolic and nuclear concentrations of Nrf2, the expression and activity of ARE/EpRE‐dependent enzymes, or any other cellular cascade triggered by coffee constituents, directly affects DNA strand breaks in humans and as such improves DNA integrity. In particular, the only human intervention study that investigated DNA strand breaks and Nrf2 translocation, which was provided by the applicant and is described above (Pahlke et al., ), did not allow conclusions to be drawn on the link between Nrf2 translocation and DNA strand breaks, owing to the methodological limitations of this study. The other human studies that were provided by the applicant (Boettler et al., 2011a; Volz et al., ), compared in one‐arm sequential trials Nrf2‐gene transcription levels in periods in which subjects refrained from coffee consumption and restricted the amounts of polyphenols in the diet with periods of coffee consumption, but did not investigate DNA strand breaks.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Seven publications reporting on six human intervention studies were identified by the applicant as pertinent to the health claim (Misik et al., ; Bakuradze et al., ; Richling et al., unpublished study report, ; Shaposhnikov et al., ; Hochkogler et al., ; Pahlke et al., ; Schipp et al., ;). Two publications (Hochkogler et al., ; Pahlke et al., ) report on the same study.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations