2009
DOI: 10.1026/1612-5010.16.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das Lateral Preference Inventory: Itemhomogenität der deutschen Version

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Das Lateral Preference Inventory (LPI, Coren, 1993 ) soll die bevorzugte Seite für die Dimensionen Händigkeit, Füßigkeit, Äugigkeit und Ohrigkeit ermitteln. In dieser Pilotstudie wurde mit N = 540 Versuchspersonen (n = 303 männlich, n = 237 weiblich) im Alter von 17 bis 37 Jahren (M = 22.1, SD = 2.7) die Konstruktvalidität auf Itemebene (Itemhomogenität) der deutschen Version des LPI untersucht. Die Seitigkeitsdimensionen wurden inferenzstatistisch mit dem ordinalen Mixed-Rasch-Modell und dem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An unilateral sports activity and high‐performance sports (> 12 h per week) during the past years was an exclusion criteria for the participant recruitment to avoid potential effects of asymmetrical loading pattern of both legs because of a specific activity. In order to determine the foot preference of the participants in specific daily activities (foot dominance), the approved German version (Büsch et al., ) of the lateral preference inventory (Chapman et al., ) was used and, therewith, the left and right leg were assigned to either dominant or non‐dominant side, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unilateral sports activity and high‐performance sports (> 12 h per week) during the past years was an exclusion criteria for the participant recruitment to avoid potential effects of asymmetrical loading pattern of both legs because of a specific activity. In order to determine the foot preference of the participants in specific daily activities (foot dominance), the approved German version (Büsch et al., ) of the lateral preference inventory (Chapman et al., ) was used and, therewith, the left and right leg were assigned to either dominant or non‐dominant side, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, psychometrically this may be inappro priate (Dragovic, 2004). Existing taxometric (Dragovic, Milenkovic, & Hammond, 2008) and latent class analyses (Bü sch, Hagemann, & Bender, 2009;Dragovic & Hammond, 2007; see Methods) suggest that handedness in actual fact is discrete and thus support classification approaches. However, studies on handedness associations with other variables seldom make use of latent variable analyses that would allow for a differential weighting of indicators and the direct modeling of handedness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In patients suffering from chronic patellar tendinopathy, lower leg strength and tendon properties were estimated in the leg of the pathology, or that leg of the most severely affected tissue disorder. In the healthy matched case-control subject, leg selection was based on leg dominance (Büsch et al, 2009) of the paired subject with tendinopathy. All subjects confirmed a 24 h absence of vigorous activities (Shalabi et al, 2004;Boesen et al, 2006) received detailed instructions, contemporaneous visual feedback, and conducted at least two exercise-specific familiarization trials prior to each testing.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%