2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-efficient deep learning of radiological image data for outcome prediction after endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the more extensive follow-up NIHSS could be used to define poor functional outcome in future studies. Furthermore, for future research, ML models could be created using the raw imaging data (CT or CT angiography or both) and combined with the models created in this study (10,12,36,37). However, the large number of data points has to be taken into account when developing such approaches because imaging data is often of high dimensionality, and medical datasets have often a very limited number of samples.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the more extensive follow-up NIHSS could be used to define poor functional outcome in future studies. Furthermore, for future research, ML models could be created using the raw imaging data (CT or CT angiography or both) and combined with the models created in this study (10,12,36,37). However, the large number of data points has to be taken into account when developing such approaches because imaging data is often of high dimensionality, and medical datasets have often a very limited number of samples.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scope of this project imaging data was hypothesized as a means to improve the performance of clinical-based outcome prediction models, rather than providing reliable outcome prediction by itself. Nevertheless, the CNN framework trained only on imaging data for the outcome prediction task showed comparable results to the data-efficient method of Hilbert et al, 2019. At the same time, performance was relatively high on the training sets compared with the test sets, indicating that the model was suffering from overfitting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A number of studies have presented models using Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) for outcome prediction based on clinical parameters (Asadi et al, 2014;Heo et al, 2019). Additionally, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on imaging data has been proven to give promising results in tissue outcome prediction (Nielsen et al, 2018;Pinto et al, 2018), as well as predicting final stroke outcome (Hilbert et al, 2019). Hence, we propose two unimodal architectures based on deep learning methods: a 3D CNN to process neuroimaging data and an MLP for processing clinical metadata; both tailored to the requirements of the data and the final outcome prediction task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first main reason was that the OCSP subtype was based on these neurological deficits. The second one was that the newly developed machine learning methods (such as deep learning) could process medical data better [27,28], even the features collected in 1990's were not very mature. In the study the dataset was firstly analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk algorithm and Pearson Correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%