2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data for the evaluation of hydrogen risks onboard vehicles: Outcomes from the French project drive

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, analytical [53,54] and experimental [54,55] studies over permeation flowrate from containers with CGH 2 provided results of the same order of magnitude obtained from the current study over concentration of H 2 in spaces such as garages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, analytical [53,54] and experimental [54,55] studies over permeation flowrate from containers with CGH 2 provided results of the same order of magnitude obtained from the current study over concentration of H 2 in spaces such as garages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…According to the regulation, the tank must also be equipped with Temperature-activated Pressured Release Device (TPRD), which will vent the hydrogen from the tank whenever a peculiarly high temperature corresponding to the fire is detected. A sufficient tank fire resistance would mean that the venting of hydrogen can proceed slowly, such that there will be no overpressure in the case of no ignition, or if a flame does ignite, it will not be harmful to the surrounding people or objects in terms of length and heat radiation [1]. Unfortunately, the fire resistance of current generations of hydrogen tanks is only around 12 minutes for type 3 cylinders (with aluminum liner) [2], and 3.5-6.5 minutes for type 4 cylinders (with plastic liner) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%