2019
DOI: 10.1002/spy2.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data provenance and trust establishment in the Internet of Things

Abstract: The Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of heterogeneous networks encompassing various forms of communications form the current traditional communication models to ubiquitous and pervasive machine to machine communications. In such an ever expanding, dynamic, and complex environment, it becomes vital to know the origin or the source of data and whether this data can be trusted or no. This requires not only accurate, secure, and correct data collection processes; but also provisioning of data provenance throu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the inevitable and rapid evolution of marine observation technology over the next decade, we need to deeply integrate precise tracing of methodologies into the metadata associated with myriad sensors (Wang et al, 2019) and autonomous platforms (Whitt et al, 2020). Those constructing the Internet of Things are confronting this issue (e.g., Elkhodr and Alsinglawi, 2020), and it is only a question of time until we will be charged with co-managing the methodological histories linked to the Internet of Ocean Things. Without a far greater capacity to integrate methodological provenance into metadata records, the marine community will struggle to generate data with clear, auditable provenance which document known uncertainties (i.e., as a component of asset grade data; AGD 1 ) using rigorous security approaches and auditing tools.…”
Section: Ocean Decade Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the inevitable and rapid evolution of marine observation technology over the next decade, we need to deeply integrate precise tracing of methodologies into the metadata associated with myriad sensors (Wang et al, 2019) and autonomous platforms (Whitt et al, 2020). Those constructing the Internet of Things are confronting this issue (e.g., Elkhodr and Alsinglawi, 2020), and it is only a question of time until we will be charged with co-managing the methodological histories linked to the Internet of Ocean Things. Without a far greater capacity to integrate methodological provenance into metadata records, the marine community will struggle to generate data with clear, auditable provenance which document known uncertainties (i.e., as a component of asset grade data; AGD 1 ) using rigorous security approaches and auditing tools.…”
Section: Ocean Decade Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the data provenance, M. Elkhodr and B. Alsinglawi introduced a new trust management solution which provides a trust establishment mechanism amongst communicating devices in IoT. Under this data provenance, this approach checks the data freshness, originality, traceability, and accuracy [12]. V.Suryani, S. Sulistyo and W. Widyawan proposed ConTrust, a new trust assessment model based on inspiration of everyday life.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data replication is one of the strategies for disaster recovery in organisations. Two contexts are considered where in, the data replication is performed via a pipeline procedure (17,18) . Data is transmitted from a primary processing environment to a secondary processing environment.…”
Section: Data Provenance and Disaster Recovery Over It Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%