2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
699
3
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 728 publications
(722 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
699
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Mandatory reporting from several independent sources ensures completeness and high data quality 40. The Cause of Death Registry contains information on all recorded deaths of Norwegian citizens living in Norway at time of death since 1st of January 1951.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandatory reporting from several independent sources ensures completeness and high data quality 40. The Cause of Death Registry contains information on all recorded deaths of Norwegian citizens living in Norway at time of death since 1st of January 1951.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…|Bias| max < 1/4·CV ref = 1/16 · (upper reference limit-lower reference limit) [4] since the width of the reference interval is 2· ( …”
Section: Analytical Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cancer Registry database is considered more than 98% complete on solid tumours. 24 The main limitation to our study is the small study group. However, using the NPI, which combines three different prognostic factors, it is possible to demonstrate statistically significant differences between asymptomatic and symptomatic breast cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%