2020
DOI: 10.1177/8755293019891727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Database of rocking shallow foundation performance: Dynamic shaking

Abstract: Several experimental studies have shown that rocking shallow foundations have beneficial seismic performance features: recentering and energy dissipation with little damage. A new publicly available database, “FoRDy” (Foundation Rocking—Dynamic), summarizes the results of dynamic physical model tests of single-degree-of-freedom-like structures supported on rocking foundations. It contains data from five centrifuge and three 1- g shaking table test series that were conducted at experimental facilities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, numerous analytical and numerical research studies have been conducted on the evaluation of SSI for a more accurate seismic response analysis; some recent studies are [10][11][12][13][14]. Several experimental works involving full or reduced scale tests of SSI problem have also been conducted during this period; see [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Literature Survey On Evaluation Of Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, numerous analytical and numerical research studies have been conducted on the evaluation of SSI for a more accurate seismic response analysis; some recent studies are [10][11][12][13][14]. Several experimental works involving full or reduced scale tests of SSI problem have also been conducted during this period; see [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Literature Survey On Evaluation Of Ssimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meyerhof (1963) and Allotey and El Naggar (2008)), derived Equation 1b for the rocking moment capacity, which is approximately equal to Equation 1a; FS in Equation 1b is the static factor of safety of the footing with respect to the vertical loading. However, Gavras et al (in press) and Hakhamaneshi and Kutter (2016) explained that Equation 1a is preferred because it can account for the effect of the shape and size of the contact area on the bearing capacity of the loaded edge of a rocking footing.…”
Section: Background On Rocking Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4e shows that the force-based FS v is similar but somewhat greater than the geometry-based A / A c . Gavras et al (in press) elaborate on factors determining the difference between A / A c and FS v . Finally, Figure 4f plots the bearing pressure ( q ) with respect to the corresponding A / A c .…”
Section: Footing Shape Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations