1988
DOI: 10.1109/64.2102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Database support for knowledge-based engineering environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there are very fine-grained models. For example specifying that after a source code file is edited, it should be recompiled [Kai88]. Recently, hybrid formalisms that use different notations for large-grain and small-grain aspects of process such as PROCESS WEAVER [Fer91], have been developed.…”
Section: Granularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, there are very fine-grained models. For example specifying that after a source code file is edited, it should be recompiled [Kai88]. Recently, hybrid formalisms that use different notations for large-grain and small-grain aspects of process such as PROCESS WEAVER [Fer91], have been developed.…”
Section: Granularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader will find in [Fin94] a detailed presentation of ten projects in the field as well as the results of a common assessment exercise performed by the leaders of these projects. Most process centred software environments [Jac92], [Bel94], [Ban93], [Kai88] are in fact used to describe the activity of tools and to allow automatic invocation of tools [Tom94]. Existing environments guide software engineers in the selection of the right suite of tools but they do not guide the engineering activities themselves.…”
Section: Enactment Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few modelling approaches rely on "formal foundations"; most define how to operate more or less informally. This new generation of process models remains activity-oriented even though the initial activity decomposition paradigm has been extended in various ways: Petri nets in EPOS [29] and SPADE [4], rule based in MERLIN [18], ALF [6], Marvel [31], EPOS, and triggers in ADELE [5] and MVP-L [20]. It is interesting to notice that formality relates to the underlying programming languages: Smalltalk for E3, various Prolog dialects for EPOS, Oikos [1] and PEACE [20], PS-Algol for PWI [29].…”
Section: Activity-oriented Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss in another paper [19] the specification of alternatives, iteration and synchronization through the conditions and effects of rules; the process is not in any sense limited to a deterministic sequence of steps. Possible chains are compiled into a network when the kernel is tailored [18]. The process engine chains among rules with different or multiple parameters by "inverting" local bindings [ 16].…”
Section: --------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%