2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(00)00087-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating buried sediments using radioactive decay and muogenic production of 26Al and 10Be

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
154
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
154
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where Y is the 10 Be yield per stopped negative muon, A 1 and A 2 are production coefficients scaled to local atmospheric attenuation, and L 1 and L 2 are different attenuation length scales (Granger and Smith, 2000).…”
Section: Production Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Y is the 10 Be yield per stopped negative muon, A 1 and A 2 are production coefficients scaled to local atmospheric attenuation, and L 1 and L 2 are different attenuation length scales (Granger and Smith, 2000).…”
Section: Production Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the ratio of 26 Al to 10 Be in deep samples from these profiles may allow erosion and age constraint (e.g. Granger and Smith, 2000), but to do so was beyond the resources available for this study.…”
Section: Surface Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cosmogenic burial dating is a technique based on the well known radioactive decay rates of cosmogenic nuclides, and is widely used in many areas of the Earth sciences and archeology (Granger and Smith, 2000). Dating materials by radioactive decay of cosmogenic nuclides requires that the sample has been completely shielded (deep burial) from cosmic radiation after the first exposure phase (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diferentes modelos matemáticos veem sendo desenvolvidos no sentido de computar a produção muônica de cosmogênicos na natureza (Granger & Smith, 2000;Schaller et al, 2001;Braucher et al, 2003;Braucher et al, 2011), cujos resultados denotam um certo consenso em torno da produção há alguns poucos metros de profundidade. Entretanto, as estimativas divergem em profundidades maiores devido a diferenças na parametrização da produção adotada de autor para autor.…”
unclassified