2015
DOI: 10.2166/9781843397489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Stormwater Controls for Urban Retrofit and Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found that centralized controls were more robust. Weinstein (2009) contended the opposite and points out a variety of financial benefits with LID that are often overlooked. Montalto et al (2007) presented a simplified hydrologic model using the rational method with a lifecycle analysis of costs and benefits using the known ranges to evaluate different LID implementations for control of CSO in New York, NY.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that centralized controls were more robust. Weinstein (2009) contended the opposite and points out a variety of financial benefits with LID that are often overlooked. Montalto et al (2007) presented a simplified hydrologic model using the rational method with a lifecycle analysis of costs and benefits using the known ranges to evaluate different LID implementations for control of CSO in New York, NY.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead to slower runoff, more infiltration to the soil, less flooding and more evapotranspiration in urban catchments (Coffman, 2000;Doug et al, 2005;EPA, 2000;Lawson, 2010;Weinstein et al, 2006Weinstein et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%