Decision Support Systems Selection of Soang Superior Brood Using Weighted Product (WP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

Abstract

Gurame Soang Latin name Osphronomus Labirynthici gouramy including fish, that as the fish have gills and breathing apparatus in the form of additional gills (Labyrinth). One important factor in fish farming Soang Gurame is holding elections. Superior brood has characteristics identical, to distinguish it needs to experience since it is quite difficult. Some of the assessment factors in selecting a superior brood that could be considered in the cultivation of the fish farmers Gurame Soang as ideal weight, physical disability, movement of fish, the shape of the head, and the body color. All of these factors combined to get an assessment that could help the decision making process fish Gurame Soang superior sires. This study used two methods that have selected the calculation accuracy of the decision-making process. The method used is the Weighted Product and Simple Additive weighting. The results of the research that has been done, it can be concluded the total number of alternative Gurame Soang superior sires data as many as 10 fish, and obtained the results of testing the level of accuracy by using the results of data from a breeder Gurame Soang superior sires, Method of Weighted Product got an accuracy of 80% and methods Simple Additive weighting got an accuracy of 60%.

Selecting goldfish broods use the weighted product and simple additive weighting methods

“…This method is grouped into various criteria, then translated from fuzzy numbers in the form of crisp numbers so that these values will be able to carry out the calculation process to find the best alternative. The following are the equations for the SAW method [1], [13]- [17], [18]- [23]. The preference value for each alternative (Vi) is given as:…”

“…Majalaya goldfish began to be widely known in 1975 through intensive aquaculture of swift water pools and is now scattered in almost every entire region Indonesia as fish consumption, as shown in Figure 1. The release of fish varieties was submitted based on the results of the research of the three institutions mentioned before [1]- [6]. The criteria that have been determined on the Majalaya goldfish are C1: ideal weight, C2: fish motion, C3: physical deformity, C4: shape of scales, C5: base of tail.…”

“…Attribute weight functions as a positive rating, while the cost attribute, including attribute ratings, functions negatively. This method uses multiplication as the attribute rating link, where the rating of each attribute must be increased first with the appropriate weight [1], [12], [19]- [24]. This process is the same as the normalization process.…”

“…The decision support system (DSS) that is expected to provide recommendations and alternative information media options for novice carp cultivators. So that it can help Majalaya goldfish cultivators choose superior broodstock for high quality Majalaya carp cultivation [1]- [8].…”

“…Based on the results of testing the WP calculation system with manual calculations, the final results are almost the same with an accuracy of 97.6%. The research was conducted in 2019 [1], using the SAW method and the WP method with the criteria of carp price, carp weight and carp health. The WP method got 80% accuracy and the SAW method got 60% accuracy from the total data of 10 alternative superior gurame soang breeds.…”