Decolonizing Open Science: Southern Interventions

Abstract

Hegemonic Open Science, emergent from the circuits of knowledge production in the Global North and serving the economic interests of platform capitalism, systematically erase the voices of the subaltern margins from the Global South and the Southern margins inhabiting the North. Framed within an overarching emancipatory narrative of creating access for and empowering the margins through data exchanged on the global free market, hegemonic Open Science processes co-opt and erase Southern epistemologies, working to create and reproduce new enclosures of extraction that serve data colonialism-capitalism. In this essay, drawing on our ongoing negotiations of community-led culture-centered advocacy and activist strategies that resist the racist, gendered, and classed structures of neocolonial knowledge production in the metropole in the North, we attend to Southern practices of Openness that radically disrupt the whiteness of hegemonic Open Science. These decolonizing practices foreground data sovereignty, community ownership, and public ownership of knowledge resources as the bases of resistance to the colonial-capitalist interests of hegemonic Open Science.

Editorial: Food systems communication amid compounding crises: Power, resistance, and change

“…Processes that manifest them are intimately connected to the intensification of the capitalist food regime, climate injustice, accelerated expansion of racial capitalism in the form of land grabs, and increased consolidation of power globally. Attending to the contours of knowledge production around these issues, and the particularities of both research and voices of resistance must involve interrupting the political economy of open access publishing as well (Dutta et al, 2021). Compounding crises inevitably affect the publication economy, which we too witnessed firsthand as co-editors of this Research Topic.…”

Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward

“…Unlike Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, data collection from these non-mainstream platforms is more technologically challenging. This created a barrier to academic research, making the data-driven study of such platforms more exclusive to tech-savvy researchers and resourceful institutions in the Global North ( Dutta et al, 2021 ).…”

Connecting Past to Present: Enacting Indigenous Data Governance Principles in Westbank First Nation’s Archaeology and Digital Heritage

“…While fruitful, these efforts typically overlook the profound influence of colonialism and underestimate the resulting structural inequalities in the development and use of definitions and classification systems, technical standards and technological infrastructure (Ali 2016 ; Montenegro 2019 ). This situation, in turn, precipitates the erasure of any role for Indigenous peoples in data governance processes (Rainie et al 2019 ; Carroll et al 2020 ) and the silencing of knowledge production in the Global South (Dutta et al 2021 ). The Global South broadly refers to geopolitical power relations and intellectual production in Latin America, Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and Oceania (Dados and Connell 2012 ).…”