2010
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-975x2010000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of aquatic macrophytes from Cantá stream (Roraima, Brazil): kinetics approach

Abstract: Aim: This study aimed at describing and comparing the kinetics of aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of Eleocharis interstincta, Nymphaea sp. and Montrichardia arborescens; Methods: The samples of aquatic macrophytes and water were collected in the Cantá Stream (02° 49' 11" N and 60° 40' 24" W), Cantá, Roraima, Brazil. The plant material was dried and triturated and for each experimental condition (aerobic and anaerobic) mineralization chambers were prepared with plant fragments and stream water. The volume o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest water DO found in the plots with flood-intolerant species ( Figure 9 ) may be the result of oxygen consumption during plant tissue decomposition [34] . Variations in CH 4 emissions have sometimes been attributed to variations in methane oxidation [35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest water DO found in the plots with flood-intolerant species ( Figure 9 ) may be the result of oxygen consumption during plant tissue decomposition [34] . Variations in CH 4 emissions have sometimes been attributed to variations in methane oxidation [35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4) indicating a sustained period of wetland inundation prior to sampling (as any drying would have resulted in lily mortality, as with C2). This would provide the microbial community with an abundant and labile subsurface carbon source (Cunha‐Santino et al ) as the lilies decompose (Sorrell et al ). Given the water column was both extremely shallow during C1 and had low DO (average 10.7% ± 12.4%; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%