2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their work indicates the interference of weights with the estimated stage efficiencies and OE. Guo et al (2017) innovations' inefficiency. Fang, Guan, Lu, Zhou, and Deng (2013) attempt to analyze changing trends in the input-output efficiency of urban agglomerations in China on the basis of DEA approach and detect that the cities achieving highest efficiency scores all belong to the parts of SEZs.…”
Section: Application Of Dea In Measuring Sez Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their work indicates the interference of weights with the estimated stage efficiencies and OE. Guo et al (2017) innovations' inefficiency. Fang, Guan, Lu, Zhou, and Deng (2013) attempt to analyze changing trends in the input-output efficiency of urban agglomerations in China on the basis of DEA approach and detect that the cities achieving highest efficiency scores all belong to the parts of SEZs.…”
Section: Application Of Dea In Measuring Sez Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additive two-stage DEA is suitable for current research that avoids the evaluation of a single DEA model (Halkos, Tzeremes, & Kourtzidis, 2015). We establish the research model by adjusting the new overall efficiency (OE) equation developed by Guo, Shureshjani, Foroughi, and Zhu (2017) and by considering the weights for substage processes, which is comprehensively explained in Section 3. Accounting the weights will reveal the relative importance of each stage on the total governance performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, DEA researchers employ two different approaches to evaluating efficiency of two‐stage systems: defining ratio efficiency or using possible production set (PPS). Various models have been developed for multiplier and envelopment two‐stage networks (Chen, Cook, & Zhu, ; Despotis, Koronakos, & Sotiros, ; Guo, Abbasi Shureshjani, Foroughi, & Zhu, ; Kao & Hwang, ; Kao & Hwang, ; Rho & An, ; Tone & Tsutsui, ) based on these two approaches. However, these models still demonstrate deficiencies in evaluating overall efficiency, divisional efficiency, and projection (benchmark DMU; Chen, Cook, Kao, & Zhu, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the subsequent research on the two stage network DEA models has focussed on developments to allow for the decomposition of the efficiency of the respective stages and the determination of overall efficiency. In this respect, two key approaches have been identified, firstly, the multiplier approach, where overall efficiency is determined as the product of the efficiencies of the two stages (Kao and Hwang, 2008 Zhu, 2016). This reveals an emphasis on refinements in the theory, whereas the purpose of this paper is on the critical review of existing network DEA applications with the purpose of determining their usefulness in performance measurement systems for support units within businesses.…”
Section: Development Of Data Envelopment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%