2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deduplicating records in systematic reviews: there are free, accurate automated ways to do so

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports were selected in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol using the Rayyan tool [ 61 , 62 , 63 ]. The convergence of blind assessments of two judges (M.C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports were selected in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol using the Rayyan tool [ 61 , 62 , 63 ]. The convergence of blind assessments of two judges (M.C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, careful consideration must be given to the merging process, and the use of automated tools can help improve the accuracy and efficiency of the process. Nevertheless, human intervention may still be required to resolve any inconsistencies or errors in the data [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its limitations, the current study has several positive features: a rigorous methodology was used based on the PRISMA guidelines 27 ; a thorough literature search using multiple independent databases; two researchers independently and in duplicate searched, selected, and extracted data from the selected studies; to resolve disputes, a third party was consulted 28,29 . Furthermore, the present study likely included the largest effect size for each outcome assessed at glucose metabolism and liver enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%