2019 Eighth International Conference on Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/eitt.2019.00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Dropout Prediction in MOOCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is due to the fact that the course duration is only five weeks, and the number of behavioral characteristics of some students drops significantly after the course, leading to partial data missing in the fifth week, which has a certain impact on the performance of the model. From the recently published literature, this paper selected five representative MOOC dropout prediction models for comparison tests with the FWTS-CNN model as follows: the logistic regression-based machine learning MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Qiu et al [28], the support vector machine based machine learning MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Kloft et al [22] , the LSTM neural network MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Wang et al [44], the CNN combined with LSTM MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Sun Xia et al [45], and the time series-based CNN MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Qiu et al [15]. The KDD CUP 2015 dataset was used as the original dataset for all models in the experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is due to the fact that the course duration is only five weeks, and the number of behavioral characteristics of some students drops significantly after the course, leading to partial data missing in the fifth week, which has a certain impact on the performance of the model. From the recently published literature, this paper selected five representative MOOC dropout prediction models for comparison tests with the FWTS-CNN model as follows: the logistic regression-based machine learning MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Qiu et al [28], the support vector machine based machine learning MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Kloft et al [22] , the LSTM neural network MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Wang et al [44], the CNN combined with LSTM MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Sun Xia et al [45], and the time series-based CNN MOOC dropout prediction model proposed by Qiu et al [15]. The KDD CUP 2015 dataset was used as the original dataset for all models in the experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, RNN models generally suffer from long-term dependency on learning behaviours in these studies, leading to limited prediction performance. Additionally, all these studies [9,14,44,50] stress more temporal characteristics, but neglect the fact that students are likely to exhibit similar learning patterns during a period.…”
Section: Learning Activity-based Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers employed techniques without manual feature engineering processes to predict dropout. Few previous works explored deep neural network (DNN) model [28], recurrent neural network (RNN) model [27,54], and convolutional neural networks (CNN) followed by RNN [42,53]. Yet, all of these recent models, so far, have given suboptimal performance.…”
Section: Video-clickstreammentioning
confidence: 99%