2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep luminosity functions and colour–magnitude relations for cluster galaxies at 0.2 < z < 0.6

Abstract: We derive deep I band luminosity functions and colour-magnitude diagrams from HST imaging for eleven 0.2 < z < 0.6 clusters observed at various stages of merging, and a comparison sample of five more relaxed clusters at similar redshifts. The characteristic magnitude M * evolves passively out to z = 0.6, while the faint end slope of the luminosity function is α ∼ −1 at all redshifts. Cluster galaxies must have been completely assembled down to M I ∼ −18 out to z = 0.6. We observe tight colourmagnitude relation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
65
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(112 reference statements)
9
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Andreon 2006;De Propris et al 2007. De Propris et al (2013) wrote that surface brightness selection effects could account for claims of evolution at the faint end. Observations with various surface brightness limits are required to confirm this hypothesis.…”
Section: The Faint End Of the Glfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Andreon 2006;De Propris et al 2007. De Propris et al (2013) wrote that surface brightness selection effects could account for claims of evolution at the faint end. Observations with various surface brightness limits are required to confirm this hypothesis.…”
Section: The Faint End Of the Glfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Propris et al 1999Propris et al , 2007Propris et al , 2013De Lucia et al 2004Andreon 2006;Muzzin et al 2008;Mancone et al 2010Mancone et al , 2012). This scenario is strongly supported by the lack of evolution in the colour−magnitude relation for the bright galaxies in clusters from z = 1 to z = 0 (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…stellar synthesis models generated by EZGal 16 . These models were normalized to a lower redshift (z ∼ 0.6) L * cluster galaxy in the observed-frame F814W band (De Propris et al 2013) and generated for a variety of different formation epochs and at a variety of different metallicities. As a rough check, we note that the galaxy properties generated by these models show broad agreement in the observed-frame K band with L * galaxies at similar redshifts (z ∼ 3−4) observed in photometric surveys and in simulations (e.g., Cirasuolo et al 2010;Henriques et al 2012;Muzzin et al 2013).…”
Section: The Density Of Massive Galaxies In CL J0227-0421mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These galaxies then evolve passively in the subsequent time (e.g. Andreon 2008; De Propris, Phillipps & Bremer 2013). Nonetheless, the details of how these massive passive cluster galaxies formed and evolved, in particular the physical processes involved, remains a matter of debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%