2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3069346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Metric Learning for Cervical Image Classification

Abstract: Cervical cancer is caused by the persistent infection of certain types of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and is a leading cause of female mortality particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) is a commonly used technique in cervical screening. While this technique is inexpensive, clinical assessment is highly subjective, and relatively poor reproducibility has been reported. A deep learning-based algorithm for automatic visual evaluation (AVE) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most broadly utilized performance analysis methods is qualitative analysis. Probabilistic statements about the algorithm's performance and weaknesses are based on human visual perception [40,54].…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most broadly utilized performance analysis methods is qualitative analysis. Probabilistic statements about the algorithm's performance and weaknesses are based on human visual perception [40,54].…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three most prominent Deep CNNs (ResNet-50, MobileNet, and NasNet) have been configured for training to create linearly separable image feature descriptors in which the collected deep features are used to train a KNN classifier ( 30 ). In Ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the DenseNet network for classification as s.s.e/non-SSE RoIs. The scoring metrics include accuracy (ACC), precision (PRC), recall (𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅), F1-score (𝐹𝐹1) [33]. The overall classification accuracy for both classes is 98%.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%