Defining criteria and indicators for a sustainability label of local public services

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThe assessment of sustainability of public services is an important issue, especially at local level, taken into account the central role of local governments as a major public employer and provider of a diversity of services. Local governments are close to citizens and are moving faster than other public sector levels with regard to the integration of sustainability principles in their operations and strategies. A sustainability label to communicate public service performance enables to disclose information directly to service users. However, there is a dearth of research about labels addressing specific sustainability criteria for local services. The main aim of this research was the development of a conceptual framework to define a sustainability label, as a tool to assess and communicate sustainability of local public services. The approach was developed taking into account criteria of the European Union Ecolabel and indicators of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. The ecolabel is a relatively well-known voluntary instrument in Europe and has the potential for application in public service activities and operations, but only assess the environmental component of sustainability. The Global Reporting Initiative, in particular the Sector Supplement for Public Agencies, was then used to integrate the other sustainability components. Thirtysix (36) criteria and respective indicators were adapted for the proposed sustainability label conceptual framework. A Portuguese local public service was used as an exploratory case study to test the proposed conceptual model into practice. The overall results demonstrate that few criteria were accomplished in this local public service, stressing that new practices and public policies need to be adopted to invert the current trend, especially through the application of assessment systems. This exploratory case study research has shown how useful can be a sustainability label to support local governments in evaluating and communicating the sustainability performance of their public services. This case could drive and support other government levels, including central and regional public administration, in adopting and exploring public service labels and their associated performance approaches.

Employee‐Driven Sustainability Performance Assessment in Public Organisations

“…Sustainability indicators have been extensively used by different professionals and become a key tool to measure sustainability (Bell & Morse, ). Sustainability indicators allow the measurement and communication of the state and progress of sustainability aspects (Ramos, ; Domingues et al, ), and to improve the dialogue with stakeholders (Ramos & Moreno Pires, ).…”

Social sustainability in the supply chain: Construct development and measurement validation

“…Scholars have proposed different measures of SCSS (Carter and Jennings, 2002;Corbiere-Nicollier et al 2011;Kozlowski et al, 2015;Domingues et al, 2015), both quantitative and qualitative (Andersen and Larsen, 2009;Tate et al, 2010;Yusuf et al, 2013). These measures differ across countries and contexts (Gugler and Shi, 2009;Huq et al, 2014), whereas their majority is supplier performance oriented (Carter and Jennings, 2002;Lu et al, 2012;Ahi and Searcy, 2015b;Silvestre, 2015a).…”

A sustainability evaluation framework for Science and Technology Institutes: an international comparative analysis

“…The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI, 2013a) produces internationally accepted guidelines for sustainability reports around the world. "GRI is a reporting guideline but also a system that can provide certification of the reporting process, using several indicators to assess and communicate the sustainability of organisations" (Domingues et al, 2015). According to Menichini and Rosati (2014), the GRI ensures transparency and completeness of released data, and therefore, its standard is the most widely used framework to support institutions in its sustainability reporting.…”