Science Communication in the World 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4279-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberation, Dialogue or Dissemination: Changing Objectives in the Communication of Science and Technology in Denmark

Abstract: Abstract:The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is ironic, then, that the configuration of science and society in Denmark has moved in the opposite direction to that of the UK-away from institutionalised participation, and towards an emphasis on deficit model-style, unidirectional communication (Horst 2012;Mejlgaard 2009). The policy context has now moved away from the use of the highly deliberative and egalitarian structures-exemplified most of all in the internationally-recognised Danish Board of Technology, or DBT-that were developed through the 1980s and '90s, and towards a new emphasis on innovation and knowledge dissemination.…”
Section: Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is ironic, then, that the configuration of science and society in Denmark has moved in the opposite direction to that of the UK-away from institutionalised participation, and towards an emphasis on deficit model-style, unidirectional communication (Horst 2012;Mejlgaard 2009). The policy context has now moved away from the use of the highly deliberative and egalitarian structures-exemplified most of all in the internationally-recognised Danish Board of Technology, or DBT-that were developed through the 1980s and '90s, and towards a new emphasis on innovation and knowledge dissemination.…”
Section: Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it does indicate a very different kind of context for dealing with questions of responsibility in science from the UK-one which does, certainly, retain the hallmarks of a peculiarly Danish culture around equality of status (and thereby the problematisation of experts and expertise), but which is increasingly turning that drive to equity against 'experts of community' such as the DBT-or, indeed, social scientists (Horst 2012).…”
Section: Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For det andet fordi diskussionerne afspejler elementer fra den saerlige danske 'konsensuskultur', som går tilbage til Grundtvig og højskolebevaegelsen (Horst & Irwin 2010). Her går ideer om dialog og faelles forståelse hånd i hånd med foragt for autoriteter og en tro på laegmands fornuft (Horst 2012), hvilket vi vil uddybe naermere i diskussionen. Denne politiske kultur er udbredt i tid og rum, og vi argumenterer for, at den også vil performe i andre danske fora, hvor videnskabelig viden indgår i politiske processer.…”
Section: Klimabevaegelsen I Danmarks Landsudvalgunclassified
“…I stedet fremmede man almuens uddannelse, den almene dannelse og personligt engagement i samfundet som den gode form for viden. Håndens og åndens arbejde kunne ikke adskilles (Horst 2012). Desuden pointeredes dialog og samtale som den rette vej til et godt samfund.…”
Section: Alle Er Lige For Sandhedenunclassified
“…The translation of science from a highly specialized language to general public knowledge has long concerned intellectuals (Berman, 1978;Broks, 2006;Dewey, 1927;Fleck, 1935Fleck, /1979Gross, 1994;LaFollette, 1990). In Denmark, according to Horst (2012), the participatory governance of science and technology is founded on cultural traditions of dialogue. This dialogical tradition is also well established in Norway (Hetland, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%