2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delivery of nanomedicines to extracellular and intracellular compartments of a solid tumor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
182
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(126 reference statements)
3
182
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the design of pH-responsive nanostructures is considered a great approach to facilitate the drug release into the cytosol by destabilizing endosomal membranes under mildly acidic conditions (Chen et al 2009). Agents commonly used to promote NP escape/release from endosomes include pH-sensitive peptides and surfactants, pH-buffering polymers, and fusogenic lipids (Li et al 2012;Nogueira et al 2014b).…”
Section: Ph-dependent Membrane-lytic Activity Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the design of pH-responsive nanostructures is considered a great approach to facilitate the drug release into the cytosol by destabilizing endosomal membranes under mildly acidic conditions (Chen et al 2009). Agents commonly used to promote NP escape/release from endosomes include pH-sensitive peptides and surfactants, pH-buffering polymers, and fusogenic lipids (Li et al 2012;Nogueira et al 2014b).…”
Section: Ph-dependent Membrane-lytic Activity Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical efficacy of the conventional treatments is often compromised by the acquisition of resistance in cancer cells and/or by the generation of several side effects to the patients (Banerjee et al 2002;Dong and Mumper 2010). In this context, the nanotechnology-based pharmaceutical products might provide a wide range of new tools and possibilities in cancer therapy, from earlier diagnostics to more efficient and more targeted treatments (Chen et al 2014;Das and Sahoo 2011;Li et al 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DOX, D/PP@M/GNP or D/ PSP@M@GNP were intravenously injected into the mice at a dose of 10 mg/kg DOX per mouse after the tumor volume reached 500 mm 3 . The tumor size and animal body weight were measured every 2 d during the study, and the volume of tumors was calculated by the following formula: volume (mm 3 ) D 1/2 A (length) £ B (width) 2 After a 24-h administration, the mice were anesthetized with 4% chloral hydrate and sacrificed; the main organs were removed to be observed with an in vivo fluorescence imaging system (CRi Maestro TX, USA). For HPLC-MS/MS analysis (Agilent 1260, USA), tumors or organs were homogenized with 1 mL water, to which 500 mL acetonitrile containing 100 ng/mL daunorubicin (Sigama-Aldrich, D8809) as internal standard was added.…”
Section: In Vitro Penetration Assay Using Tumor Spheroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the physiological barriers of the tumor restrict the effective distribution of the therapeutics to all tumor cells. 1,2 Second, the acquired drug resistance resulting from monotherapy cripples the antitumor efficiency of available drugs. 3,4 Codelivery nanocarriers have shown the potential to overcome these 2 challenges or reduce their effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%