2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEM-Based Approaches for the Delineation of Flood-Prone Areas in an Ungauged Basin in Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study confirmed that the classification using the elevation difference to the nearest stream (i.e., HAND) was reliable for delineating flood-prone areas, something also suggested in a remote sensing application of the HAND model by Westerhoff et al (2011) and later confirmed by Nobre et al (2016) and by Zheng et al (2018). Manfreda et al (2015) and Samela et al (2016Samela et al ( , 2017 further tested the ability of single and composite indices to classify flood-prone areas. The Geomorphic Flood Index (GFI, Samela et al, 2017), was found to be the best performing and the most consistent index (Manfreda et al, 2015;Samela et al, 2016Samela et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Hydrogeomorphic Flood Hazard Mapping: a Reviewsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their study confirmed that the classification using the elevation difference to the nearest stream (i.e., HAND) was reliable for delineating flood-prone areas, something also suggested in a remote sensing application of the HAND model by Westerhoff et al (2011) and later confirmed by Nobre et al (2016) and by Zheng et al (2018). Manfreda et al (2015) and Samela et al (2016Samela et al ( , 2017 further tested the ability of single and composite indices to classify flood-prone areas. The Geomorphic Flood Index (GFI, Samela et al, 2017), was found to be the best performing and the most consistent index (Manfreda et al, 2015;Samela et al, 2016Samela et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Hydrogeomorphic Flood Hazard Mapping: a Reviewsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Manfreda et al (2015) and Samela et al (2016Samela et al ( , 2017 further tested the ability of single and composite indices to classify flood-prone areas. The Geomorphic Flood Index (GFI, Samela et al, 2017), was found to be the best performing and the most consistent index (Manfreda et al, 2015;Samela et al, 2016Samela et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Hydrogeomorphic Flood Hazard Mapping: a Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step is in fact the flood hazard assessment stage, leading to results which can support decision makers regarding the selection of preventive measures. In the literature, no study exists dealing with the problem as in the way used here other than a case study performed very recently by Samela et al (2016) for delineation of flood-prone areas in ungauged basins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall intensity, slope, flow accumulation, geology, land use, and elevation were considered. Degiorgis et al (2013) explored threshold binary classifier techniques for the Tanaro River, Italy for insurance purposes and Samela et al (2016) employed linear binary classifiers to identify flood-prone areas in Africa. Papaioannou et al (2015) studied a multicriteria perspective for delineation of potential floodprone areas for the Xerias River watershed, Greece.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%