Dental implants in a patient with left mandibular fibrous dysplasia: Two-year outcomes on the normal and affected sides

Adnot, Jérôme; Moizan, Hervé; Trost, O.

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.02.005

Cited by 7 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies had a follow-up time of more than 12 months. [9,11,16,18] In one article, the follow-up time is unknown. [13] 3.2.3 Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD)…”

Section: Cleido-cranial Dysplasia (Ccd)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[34] Our review found a 100% success rate for dental implants in 5 patients with up to 7 years of follow-up. [9,11,13,16,18] However, it was observed that the contact between diseased bone and the implants is less stable than in healthy bone. [35][36][37] Hence, several authors suggested inserting longer implants (up to 16 mm) for compensation.…”

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[11,16] Other precautions included low-speed drilling, ample irrigation, and late loading of the implants at 6 months. [18] The latter time point is questionable since all loading strategies (2-12 months) were successful. [9,11,13,16,18] 4.3 Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia is a rare fibro-osseous lesion [38] described first in 1976 by Melrose.…”

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[18] The latter time point is questionable since all loading strategies (2-12 months) were successful. [9,11,13,16,18] 4.3 Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia is a rare fibro-osseous lesion [38] described first in 1976 by Melrose. [39] Many names were given to this pathology, but it was renamed FCOD in the second edition of the WHO classification of odontogenic tumors in 2013.…”

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Survival of dental implants in patients with bone dysplasia: A systematic review

Perez

Dib

Terzic

et al. 2021

DCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study used published studies to assess the survival rate of dental implants placed in patients with bone dysplasia of the maxillofacial region.Material and methods: An electronic search without a specified date range was performed using the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. No gender or age restrictions were applied.Results: Eighteen publications were found that met the study’s criteria, reporting data on 18 patients with bone dysplasia including cleidocranial dysplasia (CDD), fibrous dysplasia (FD), florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD), and odonto-maxillary segmental dysplasia (SOMD), who received a total of 130 implants, an average of 7.2 implants/patient (range 1 to 16). The mean age of the patients was 36.7 years (range 15 to 70 years). For implants placed in bone dysplasia, the survival rates were 100% for patients with CDD (n = 8), FD (n = 5), SOMD (n = 2), FCOD with implants inserted far from the lesions (n = 2) and 0% for dental implants inserted within FCOD (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 38.2 months (min 6, max 60).Conclusions: Dental implants placed in patients with dysplastic bone lesions show high survival rates, similar to those in the general population for CDD, FD, and SOMD. For FCOD, the failure rate was 100%.

show abstract

“…Four studies had a follow-up time of more than 12 months. [9,11,16,18] In one article, the follow-up time is unknown. [13] 3.2.3 Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD)…”

Section: Cleido-cranial Dysplasia (Ccd)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fibrous Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Survival of dental implants in patients with bone dysplasia: A systematic review

Perez

Dib

Terzic

et al. 2021

DCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, the persistence of an anomalous bone remodelling and the possibility of a disease reactivation can reduce the reliability of the prosthesis in time. Apart from a case report in 2008 with a 4‐year follow‐up, 9 no other cases have been published except for a recent case of posterior mandibular edentulism after 2 years of functional loading 10 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental implantology and fibrous dysplasia: A 6‐year follow‐up case report and a literature review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: It is unclear if fibrous dysplasia (FD) represents a contraindication for implant borne rehabilitation, and only two successful cases are reported in the literature with a 4-2-year follow-up. The present paper discusses this issue reporting a full-arch maxillary rehabilitation with a >5-year follow-up. Materials and Methods:A 79-year-old woman complained of a progressive asymmetry of the medial facial third with inter-arch occlusal alterations, reduced mandibular movements, upper right dental dislocation and mobility and toothache in the upper posterior jaw. The X-ray supported monostotic FD diagnosis was followed by a remodelling intervention in general anaesthesia, with the extraction of the hopeless teeth. After that and the failed rehabilitation with a removable prosthetic device, the patient underwent implant placement procedure for a fixed 'Toronto-bridge' prosthesis.Results: After 6 years from implant loading, a posterior vestibular swelling of the affected maxilla was recorded, and one implant in 1.1 position had to be removed for periimplantitis, without compromising the rehabilitation. Conclusions:The acceptable results obtained in this case should promote the dental implantology practice in FD affected jaws, evaluating the proper clinical situations and the more adequate technological solutions.

show abstract

Dental implants at sites of focal high and mixed density osseous lesions: Treatment strategies

Akers

Wagner²,

Vargas³

et al. 2022

Clin Adv Periodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Focused Clinical Question Under what circumstances may a clinician consider dental implant placement at a site exhibiting a focal high or mixed density (HMD) osseous lesion radiologically? Summary Some conditions and pathologic entities exhibiting high and mixed density radiological appearance pose low risk for dental implant failure or complications following implant surgery. However, other lesions represent contraindications to implant placement, and implant surgery at such sites can result in severe morbidity. Conclusion Potential implant sites exhibiting focal HMD osseous lesions/conditions present varying levels of risk. In most cases, optimal management will include advanced imaging of the site, multidisciplinary consultations, and detailed informed consent to assure full understanding of procedural risks, benefits, and complications. Currently, clinical recommendations rely on case reports, opinion, and usual practice (level 3 evidence). The strength of each recommendation provided in this report is categorized as level C.

show abstract

Dental implants in a patient with left mandibular fibrous dysplasia: Two-year outcomes on the normal and affected sides

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Survival of dental implants in patients with bone dysplasia: A systematic review

Survival of dental implants in patients with bone dysplasia: A systematic review

Dental implantology and fibrous dysplasia: A 6‐year follow‐up case report and a literature review

Dental implants at sites of focal high and mixed density osseous lesions: Treatment strategies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About