2014
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Implants in Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate Patients: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…42 More prospective clinical studies of dental implants in cleft sites are needed to improve the quality of evidence on their success rates. 43 Mesializing the maxillary canine into the lateral incisor space (canine substitution) is a common alternative to implants, yielding similar esthetic results. 44 …”
Section: Deciduous Dentition: 2 To 7 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 More prospective clinical studies of dental implants in cleft sites are needed to improve the quality of evidence on their success rates. 43 Mesializing the maxillary canine into the lateral incisor space (canine substitution) is a common alternative to implants, yielding similar esthetic results. 44 …”
Section: Deciduous Dentition: 2 To 7 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A seleção de diâmetro e comprimento do implante é feita de acordo com a disponibilidade óssea no local receptor 10 . No que se refere à inserção de implantes na área da fenda alveolar, a influência destas medidas ainda não foi suficientemente investigada 15 ; entretanto, Borgnat et al 16 afirmaram que o comprimento dos implantes é um critério importante para o sucesso e, segundo os referidos autores, muitos estudos concordam que os implantes devem ter pelo menos um comprimento de 10 mm. Estudos clínicos mostram que mesmo os implantes com diâmetros inferiores a 3,0 mm proporcionam estabilidade primária suficiente em casos com volume ósseo limitado 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Rekomendowane jest wykonanie zabiegu po zakończeniu wzrostu kości oraz w okresie 4-6 miesięcy po zabiegu przeszczepu tkanki kostnej. 4,5 Celem niniejszej pracy było przedstawienie opisów przypadków dwóch pacjentek poddanych leczeniu implantoprotetycznemu, z powodu konieczności rekonstrukcji brakujących siekaczy bocznych.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified