2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental microwear textural analysis as an analytical tool to depict individual traits and reconstruct the diet of a primate

Abstract: Considering the interplay between the tested variables and both dental microwear and diet, we reaffirm that food physical properties play a major role in microwear variations. These results suggest that DMTA parameters may provide valuable hints for paleoecological reconstruction using fragmentary fossil dental remains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
35
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our findings, the DMTA showed that during the Late Holocene the diet of aurochs from northeastern Europe was mixed or browsing (Hofman- Kamińska, Merceron, et al, 2018). This is likely to be the effect of seasonality in the animal's diet, which is possible to detect through teeth microwear analysis (Percher et al, 2018), therefore, has a different chronological resolution than the reconstruction of the diet reflecting the whole life of the animal, which is given by the analysis of stable isotopes (Hedges, Clement, Thomas, & O'connell TC, 2007).…”
Section: Stable Isotope Composition Of Large Herbivores During the contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our findings, the DMTA showed that during the Late Holocene the diet of aurochs from northeastern Europe was mixed or browsing (Hofman- Kamińska, Merceron, et al, 2018). This is likely to be the effect of seasonality in the animal's diet, which is possible to detect through teeth microwear analysis (Percher et al, 2018), therefore, has a different chronological resolution than the reconstruction of the diet reflecting the whole life of the animal, which is given by the analysis of stable isotopes (Hedges, Clement, Thomas, & O'connell TC, 2007).…”
Section: Stable Isotope Composition Of Large Herbivores During the contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, most dental microwear studies are not focused on precisely how microwear is formed at a microscopic level. Instead, they tend to either examine (a) how overall patterns of dental microwear relate to the effects of oral food processing of specific foods and abrasives (e.g., Hoffman et al, ; Mainland, ; Merceron, Viriot, & Blondel, ; Merceron et al, ; Schulz et al, or (b) how those patterns of dental microwear might reflect similarities and differences in diet, ecology, and so on (e.g., Calandra & Merceron, ; Daegling et al, ; Percher et al, ; Scott, Teaford, & Ungar, ; Teaford, Ungar, & Grine, ). As such, they involve longer‐term, cumulative effects of microwear events overlain on each other, ultimately hinging on questions of how microwear patterns are created, maintained, and/or changed through time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many microwear‐based dietary reconstructions are ultimately based on correlations between patterns of dental microwear in extant taxa and published differences in diet for those taxa. By comparison, there have been very few studies of dental microwear on living animals (e.g., Hoffman, Fraser, & Clementz, ; Nystrom, Phillips‐Conroy, & Jolly, ; Percher et al, ; Teaford & Glander, , ; Teaford & Oyen, , ; Teaford & Tylenda, ) and even fewer longitudinal, in vivo, studies of dental microwear formation (Romero, Galbany, De Juan, & Pérez‐Pérez, ; Teaford & Lytle, ; Teaford & Oyen, ). Moreover, while a growing number of primate behavioral studies are including analyses of food material properties or exogenous grit (e.g., Dominy, Vogel, Yeakel, Constantino, & Lucas, ; Elgart Berry, ; Kinzey & Norconk, , ; Lucas et al, ; Lucas & Teaford, ; Teaford, Lucas, Ungar, & Glander, ; Ungar, Teaford, Glander, & Pastor, ; Vogel et al, ; Wright, ; Wright et al, ; Yamashita, ), only one has combined these data with dental microwear analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported on varying microwear patterns due to age, sex or seasonality (e.g., Gordon, 1982;Percher et al, 2018;Schulz-Kornas et al, 2019), which are mainly influenced by dietary variation but also by external factors (e.g., dust). For chimpanzees with a versatile diet (e.g., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, 1990b;Tutin et al, 1991;Boesch and Boesch-Achermann, 2000;Morgan and Sanz, 2006) it raises the question as to whether the actual dietary variation of chimpanzees is too diverse (e.g., Tutin et al, 1991;Boesch and Boesch-Achermann, 2000;Morgan and Sanz, 2006;Pruetz, 2006) to reflect changes in single feeding categories in the 3DST pattern.…”
Section: Sex and Season Influence The Wear Pattern Stronger Than Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the latter allows for the quantification of various geometric aspects, such as surface height, feature density, and surface complexity. By using SSFA to study inter-individual dietary habits in mandrills Percher et al (2018) found an indication for a positive correlation between the fill volume of texture features and age, which these authors assumed to be correlated with a slight increase in hard objects and monocotyledons consumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%